These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28115824)

  • 1. Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.
    Edwards MA; Roy S
    Environ Eng Sci; 2017 Jan; 34(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 28115824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia.
    Roy S; Edwards MA
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5701. PubMed ID: 37029143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived losses of scientific integrity under the Trump administration: A survey of federal scientists.
    Goldman GT; Carter JM; Wang Y; Larson JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231929. PubMed ID: 32324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals.
    Meirmans S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 Feb; 30(1):6. PubMed ID: 38349578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.
    Anderson MS; Ronning EA; De Vries R; Martinson BC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):437-61. PubMed ID: 18030595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research.
    Kwee RM; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110553. PubMed ID: 36228454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science as collaborative knowledge generation.
    Ellemers N
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 33616965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of US Biomedical Researchers, 1996 to 2022.
    Ioannidis JPA; Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Dec; 5(12):e2245590. PubMed ID: 36477476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
    Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System.
    Tang L; Wang L; Hu G
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Nov; 29(6):39. PubMed ID: 37991609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications.
    Fanelli D; Schleicher M; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0255334. PubMed ID: 35235555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved.
    Bouter L
    Account Res; 2023 Mar; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 36888916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.
    Myers TA; Kotcher J; Stenhouse N; Anderson AA; Maibach E; Beall L; Leiserowitz A
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):843-860. PubMed ID: 26960910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities.
    Robishaw JD; DeMets DL; Wood SK; Boiselle PM; Hennekens CH
    Am J Med; 2020 Mar; 133(3):e87-e90. PubMed ID: 31520622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure.
    Grimes DR; Bauch CT; Ioannidis JPA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Jan; 5(1):171511. PubMed ID: 29410855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies.
    White J; Tannenbaum C; Klinge I; Schiebinger L; Clayton J
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Sep; 106(10):3034-3048. PubMed ID: 34137862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.
    Bouter L
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 31965429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sanctions and remediation for research misconduct: differential diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
    Shore EG
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S44-8. PubMed ID: 8373490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.