These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28116047)

  • 1. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing potential mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Peckenpaugh B; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Dec; 34(12):1970-1980. PubMed ID: 34653290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.
    Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20182535. PubMed ID: 30900533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila.
    Jaenike J; Dyer KA; Cornish C; Minhas MS
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):e325. PubMed ID: 17032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.
    Hamel JA; Eskeland EE; Lehmann TK; Stover PL
    J Insect Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 30165456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.
    Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of reproductive isolation in the
    Humphreys DP; Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 29491905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interspecific mating bias may drive
    Zhou J; Liu S; Liu H; Xie Z; Liu L; Lin L; Jiang J; Yang M; Zhou G; Gu J; Zhou X; Yan G; James AA; Chen XG
    PNAS Nexus; 2022 May; 1(2):pgac041. PubMed ID: 35601361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male-driven reproductive and agonistic character displacement in darters and its implications for speciation in allopatry.
    Moran RL; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 29492043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.
    Pitnick S; Brown WD; Miller GT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1467):557-63. PubMed ID: 11297171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.
    Pfennig KS; Rice AM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140949. PubMed ID: 24990680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.