100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2811616)
1. MR assessment of spinal metastases using the late 26 sequence.
Greco A; Palmer N
Magn Reson Imaging; 1989; 7(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 2811616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of suspected spinal canal disease in patients with known malignancy.
Loughrey GJ; Collins CD; Todd SM; Brown NM; Johnson RJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):849-55. PubMed ID: 11069740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The role of T2*-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the study of suspected dorsal-lumbosacral vertebral metastases].
Sardanelli F; Melani E; Sabattini R; Parodi RC; Castaldi A; Rescinito G; Mariani G; Luzzani M
Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 9465233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of spinal neoplasms: preliminary investigation and comparison with unenhanced spin-echo and STIR sequences.
Stimac GK; Porter BA; Olson DO; Gerlach R; Genton M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Dec; 151(6):1185-92. PubMed ID: 3055895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer vertebral metastases: changes on treatment and correlation with response to therapy.
Brown AL; Middleton G; MacVicar AD; Husband JE
Clin Radiol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 9714388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.
Smoker WR; Godersky JC; Knutzon RK; Keyes WD; Norman D; Bergman W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1241-8. PubMed ID: 3500616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early diagnosis of spinal metastases by CT and MR studies.
Colman LK; Porter BA; Redmond J; Olson DO; Stimac GK; Dunning DM; Friedl KE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 3366955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography.
Carmody RF; Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Seeger JF; Unger EC; Johnson JE
Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 2675185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Opposed-phase Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Treated and Untreated Spinal Metastases.
Perry MT; Sebro R
Acad Radiol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):877-882. PubMed ID: 29398437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact on treatment planning of MRI of the spine in patients suspected of vertebral metastasis: an efficacy study.
Colletti PM; Siegel HJ; Woo MY; Young HY; Terk MR
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1996; 20(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 8930468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of spinal metastasis: are MR images without contrast medium application sufficient?
Park C; Lee JW; Kim Y; Ahn S; Lee E; Kang Y; Kang HS
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():165-173. PubMed ID: 30904626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of neoplasms of the lumbar spine.
Sevick RJ; Wallace CJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 Aug; 7(3):539-53, ix. PubMed ID: 10494534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The STIR sequence. Comparison with other MRI sequences and scintigraphy in detecting spinal metastases].
Laissy JP; Lavayssière R; Cabee AE; Thiebot J; Hugonet P; Kanoui A
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 2782830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone Marrow Metastases: T2-weighted Dixon Spin-Echo Fat Images Can Replace T1-weighted Spin-Echo Images.
Maeder Y; Dunet V; Richard R; Becce F; Omoumi P
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):948-959. PubMed ID: 29095674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study of vertebral metastasis by MR imaging: significance of T2*weighted image (gradient field echo) and metastatic pattern].
Sugiyama A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jul; 54(8):767-75. PubMed ID: 8072867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of vertebral metastases at 0.2 Tesla: clinical evaluation of T1-weighted opposed-phase gradient-echo imaging.
Ohno S; Togami I; Sei T; Ida K; Tsunoda M; Yamaoka K; Kanazawa S; Hiraki Y
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 2003; 35(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 15552725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastasis?
Chiewvit P; Danchaivijitr N; Sirivitmaitrie K; Chiewvit S; Thephamongkhol K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):818-29. PubMed ID: 19530588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spinal MR imaging in suspected metastases: correlation with skeletal scintigraphy.
Colletti PM; Dang HT; Deseran MW; Kerr RM; Boswell WD; Ralls PW
Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1881253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the metastatic vertebral tumor].
Sugimura K; Sugihara M; Furukawa M; Yasui K; Ishida T; Yamasaki K; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 May; 49(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 2798051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans.
Avrahami E; Tadmor R; Dally O; Hadar H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1989; 13(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 2745777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
