85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2811644)
1. [Reproducibility of a mathematical model for calculating survival in multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2811644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of a morphologic staging method (myeloma progression score) in multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Collacciani A; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(3):280-2. PubMed ID: 2615598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Collacciani A; Casale R; Natali G
Panminerva Med; 1991; 33(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 1923560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study of 2 prognostic classification systems for myeloma and examination of the correlation between initial bone marrow plasmacytosis and prognosis. A propos of a homogeneous population of 50 patients followed from diagnosis to death].
Pesce A; Cassuto JP; Grisot C; Gratecos N; Bayle J; Viot G; Dujardin P
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1983; 25(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 6657481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. Relationship between immunological types, single prognostic factors, clinical staging systems, morphological classification systems and survival].
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Casale R; Di Lauro G; Collacciani A; Festuccia V; Trotta A; Natali G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1990; 5(3 Pt 1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2288822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two staging systems for myeloma.
Vercelli D; Cozzolino F; Di Guglielmo R
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1981; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7290984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Selection using multivariate analysis].
Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Casale R; Lorenzetti G; Natali G
Recenti Prog Med; 1989 Oct; 80(10):543-6. PubMed ID: 2602637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic factors in multiple myeloma: selection using Cox's proportional hazard model.
Pasqualetti P; Collacciani A; Maccarone C; Casale R
Biomed Pharmacother; 1996; 50(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8672729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staging multiple myeloma patients with active disease using serum levels of beta2m-free HLA class I heavy chain together with IgM or platelet count.
Perosa F; Minoia C; Favoino E; Prete M; Dammacco F
Blood Cells Mol Dis; 2009; 42(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 18996035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma: use of light microscopy as well as computerized image analyzer in the assessment of microvessel density and total vascular area in multiple myeloma and its correlation with various clinical, histological, and laboratory parameters.
Bhatti SS; Kumar L; Dinda AK; Dawar R
Am J Hematol; 2006 Sep; 81(9):649-56. PubMed ID: 16845660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognostic factors in IgG and micromolecular multiple myeloma. Retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases].
Pasqualetti P; Casale R; Colantonio D; Festuccia V; Di Lauro G; Natali G
Minerva Med; 1987 May; 78(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 3587727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical considerations on a comparative study of two staging systems for multiple myeloma.
Merlini G; Jayakar D
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1984; 26(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 6527945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are associated with reduced survival in patients with multiple myeloma.
Katodritou E; Verrou E; Hadjiaggelidou C; Gastari V; Laschos K; Kontovinis L; Kapetanos D; Constantinou N; Terpos E; Zervas K
Am J Hematol; 2008 Sep; 83(9):697-701. PubMed ID: 18626886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. II. Clinical staging systems.
Scudla V; Indrák K
Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):481-93. PubMed ID: 4047259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Proposal of a new staging system using scoring of multiple myeloma].
Pasqualetti P; Collacciani A; Casale R; Colantonio D
Medicina (Firenze); 1989; 9(4):410-3. PubMed ID: 2634228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serum level of interleukin-16 in multiple myeloma patients and its relationship to disease activity.
Alexandrakis MG; Passam FH; Kyriakou DS; Christophoridou AV; Perisinakis K; Hatzivasili A; Foudoulakis A; Castanas E
Am J Hematol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 14755377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
