These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28116701)

  • 1. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.
    Juhasz BJ; Sheridan H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 31278632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-lingual neighborhood effects in generalized lexical decision and natural reading.
    Dirix N; Cop U; Drieghe D; Duyck W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):887-915. PubMed ID: 28095009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age of acquisition effects in Chinese two-character compound words: a megastudy of eye movements during reading.
    Wang J; Chen B; Jiang X
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):166-175. PubMed ID: 37438602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Kornrumpf B; Niefind F; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1374-91. PubMed ID: 27167402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements during reading and topic scanning: effects of word frequency.
    White SJ; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 25528014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.
    Juhasz BJ; Johnson RL; Brewer J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Apr; 46(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 27246520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 29185866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial.
    Carter BT; Luke SG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):482-492. PubMed ID: 28816481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.
    Chen Q; Huang X; Bai L; Xu X; Yang Y; Tanenhaus MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):510-518. PubMed ID: 27432001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.
    Ma G; Li X; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1409-19. PubMed ID: 26168144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.