These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28116816)

  • 1. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating causal effects for multivalued treatments: a comparison of approaches.
    Linden A; Uysal SD; Ryan A; Adams JL
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):534-52. PubMed ID: 26482211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
    Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
    Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.
    Bang H; Robins JM
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 16401269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance estimators for weighted and stratified linear dose-response function estimators using generalized propensity score.
    Garès V; Chauvet G; Hajage D
    Biom J; 2022 Jan; 64(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 34327720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.
    Mao H; Li L; Greene T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2439-2454. PubMed ID: 29921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1065-71. PubMed ID: 25266868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of approaches for stratifying on the propensity score to reduce bias.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 28074629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
    Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of empirical Bayes and propensity score methods for road safety evaluation: A simulation study.
    Li H; Graham DJ; Ding H; Ren G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():148-155. PubMed ID: 31150921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
    Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model averaged double robust estimation.
    Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.