These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28116884)

  • 21. Long-term follow-up and quality of life after robot assisted sacrohysteropexy.
    Grimminck K; Mourik SL; Tjin-Asjoe F; Martens J; Aktas M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():27-31. PubMed ID: 27614268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hach CE; Krude J; Reitz A; Reiter M; Haferkamp A; Buse S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25851586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases.
    Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Trendelenburg Angles in Vaginal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Uterovaginal Apical Prolapse Repairs.
    Jaresova A; Warda H; Macharia A; Hacker MR; Li J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 33857670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
    Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-term and long-term follow-up of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a district general hospital.
    Reddy K; Malik TG
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):532-6. PubMed ID: 12521424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors Influencing Selection of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, or Robotic Surgery to Treat Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 26945273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy in patients with levator ani avulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Svabik K; Martan A; Masata J; El-Haddad R; Hubka P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 24615948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Streamlined Surgical Approach to Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Post-Hysterectomy Vault Prolapse.
    Zebede S; Dawood A; Alarab M; Drutz H; Lovatsis D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 May; 38(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 27261220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Bonidie MJ; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1317-1323. PubMed ID: 28889173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
    Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Oliver JL; Kim JH
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.