These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28116884)

  • 61. Robotic Single-Site Sacrocolpopexy with Retroperitoneal Tunneling.
    Liu J; Bardawil E; Zurawin RK; Wu J; Fu H; Orejuela F; Guan X
    JSLS; 2018; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 30356342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse.
    Louis-Sylvestre C; Herry M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 May; 24(5):731-3. PubMed ID: 23314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of a novel technique of sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of apical prolapse.
    Rajshekhar S; Mukhopadhyay S; Morris E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 135(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 27498595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.
    Paek J; Lee M; Kim BW; Kwon Y
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 26514118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Geller EJ; Siddiqui NY; Wu JM; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 19037026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for uterine and post-hysterectomy prolapse: anatomical and functional outcomes.
    Chan CM; Liang HH; Go WW; To WW; Mok KM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Aug; 17(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
    Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
    Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go?
    Wong V; Guzman Rojas R; Shek KL; Chou D; Moore KH; Dietz HP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):404-408. PubMed ID: 26877210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
    Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The Impact of Obesity on Intraoperative Complications and Prolapse Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Turner L; Lavelle E; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 27054791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study.
    Cucinella G; Calagna G; Romano G; Di Buono G; Gugliotta G; Saitta S; Adile G; Manzone M; Accardi G; Perino A; Agrusa A
    G Chir; 2016; 37(3):113-117. PubMed ID: 27734794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Using Only Absorbable Suture for Mesh Fixation.
    Linder BJ; Anand M; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 27636221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse].
    Oguchi N; Yoshida K; Inoue T; Kawa G; Kinoshita H; Yoshimura Y; Yamaguchi O; Matsuda T
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2007 Jul; 53(7):467-71. PubMed ID: 17702179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Positive symptom improvement with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse: interim results from an active multicenter trial.
    Schwartz M; Abbott KR; Glazerman L; Sobolewski C; Jarnagin B; Ailawadi R; Lucente V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 17848317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using Seratex Slimsling: pilot study.
    Vašíček M; Pilka R; Eim JB
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(6):412-417. PubMed ID: 31948248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Apical prolapse repair: weighing the risks and benefits.
    Hill AJ; Barber MD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 27(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 26308201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The use of a xenogenic barrier to prevent mesh erosion with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Ross JW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 17630165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.