177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28117147)
1. Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time.
Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Bakrania K; Stanley RM; Parfitt G; Eston RG; Yates T; Fraysse F
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Apr; 20(4):368-372. PubMed ID: 28117147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparability of children's sedentary time estimates derived from wrist worn GENEActiv and hip worn ActiGraph accelerometer thresholds.
Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Kim Y; Rowlands AV; Welk GJ; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 29650338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving Forward with Backward Compatibility: Translating Wrist Accelerometer Data.
Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Fairclough SJ; Boddy LM; Olds TS; Parfitt G; Noonan RJ; Downs SJ; Knowles ZR; Beets MW
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Nov; 48(11):2142-2149. PubMed ID: 27327029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children.
Roscoe CMP; James RS; Duncan MJ
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 28674825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.
Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Brønd J; Arvidsson D; Montoye AHK
Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095008. PubMed ID: 31518999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of accelerometry to classify activity beneficial to bone in premenopausal women.
Stiles VH; Griew PJ; Rowlands AV
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Dec; 45(12):2353-61. PubMed ID: 23698245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old.
Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear Compliance and Activity in Children Wearing Wrist- and Hip-Mounted Accelerometers.
Fairclough SJ; Noonan R; Rowlands AV; Van Hees V; Knowles Z; Boddy LM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Feb; 48(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26375253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.
Zhou SM; Hill RA; Morgan K; Stratton G; Gravenor MB; Bijlsma G; Brophy S
BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007447. PubMed ID: 25968000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliable recognition of lying, sitting, and standing with a hip-worn accelerometer.
Vähä-Ypyä H; Husu P; Suni J; Vasankari T; Sievänen H
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 29144567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration and Validation of a Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph Accelerometer in 4-Year-Old Children.
Johansson E; Larisch LM; Marcus C; Hagströmer M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162436. PubMed ID: 27617962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.
Kerr J; Marinac CR; Ellis K; Godbole S; Hipp A; Glanz K; Mitchell J; Laden F; James P; Berrigan D
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Mar; 49(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 27755355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data.
Ahmadi MN; Nathan N; Sutherland R; Wolfenden L; Trost SG
J Sports Sci; 2020 Feb; 38(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 31826746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer.
Choi L; Ward SC; Schnelle JF; Buchowski MS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Oct; 44(10):2009-16. PubMed ID: 22525772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
