BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28117215)

  • 1. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve and Postlearning Curve Outcomes of Two Experience- and Volume-Matched Surgeons for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Good DW; Stewart GD; Laird A; Stolzenburg JU; Cahill D; McNeill SA
    J Endourol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):939-47. PubMed ID: 25630790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Novara G; Ficarra V; Mocellin S; Ahlering TE; Carroll PR; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Patel VR; Shariat SF; Tewari AK; Van Poppel H; Zattoni F; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Rosen RC; Wilson TG
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):382-404. PubMed ID: 22749851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
    Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement).
    Louie-Johnsun MW; Handmer MM; Calopedos RJ; Chabert C; Cohen RJ; Gianduzzo TR; Kearns PA; Moon DA; Ooi J; Shannon T; Sofield D; Tan AH
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118 Suppl 3():43-48. PubMed ID: 27659257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.
    Ong WL; Evans SM; Spelman T; Kearns PA; Murphy DG; Millar JL
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 26573954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy significantly reduced biochemical recurrence compared to retro pubic radical prostatectomy.
    Fujimura T; Fukuhara H; Taguchi S; Yamada Y; Sugihara T; Nakagawa T; Niimi A; Kume H; Igawa Y; Homma Y
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Jun; 17(1):454. PubMed ID: 28662644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer.
    Gandaglia G; De Lorenzis E; Novara G; Fossati N; De Groote R; Dovey Z; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Rocco B; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2017 Feb; 71(2):249-256. PubMed ID: 27209538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.
    Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Salas RS; Galiano M; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
    BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 23889763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Oncological Results: A Reverse Systematic Review.
    Moretti TBC; Magna LA; Reis LO
    J Endourol; 2023 May; 37(5):521-530. PubMed ID: 36924303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy monotherapy, a more aggressive yet less invasive option, is oncologically effective in selected men with high-risk prostate cancer having only one D'Amico risk factor: experience from an Asian tertiary referral center.
    Tai HC; Lai MK; Huang CY; Wang SM; Huang KH; Chen CH; Chung SD; Chueh SC; Yu HJ; Pu YS
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 23987245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Porpiglia F; Fiori C; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Checcucci E; De Luca S; Passera R; Scarpa RM
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jan; 4(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 28753822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.