296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28117329)
1. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.
Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L
Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD006008. PubMed ID: 25208303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD006008. PubMed ID: 28796279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.
Barken KB; Vaabengaard R
BMC Urol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):153. PubMed ID: 36123663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(9):1-31. PubMed ID: 23074500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.
Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C
BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrophilic catheters for intermittent catheterization and occurrence of urinary tract infections. A retrospective comparative study in patients with spinal cord Injury.
Ali S; Khan OS; Youssef AM; Saba I; Alfedaih D
BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38867233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections.
Plata M; Santander J; Zuluaga L; Torres-Sandoval C; Valencia S; Azuero J; Trujillo CG
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):491-499. PubMed ID: 36547679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of catheter-based bladder drainage method on urinary tract infection risk in spinal cord injury and neurogenic bladder: A systematic review.
Kinnear N; Barnett D; O'Callaghan M; Horsell K; Gani J; Hennessey D
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):854-862. PubMed ID: 31845396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial.
De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term bladder management by intermittent catheterisation in adults and children.
Moore KN; Fader M; Getliffe K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD006008. PubMed ID: 17943874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique.
Waller L; Jonsson O; Norlén L; Sullivan L
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):345-8. PubMed ID: 7815579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current evidence on intermittent catheterization: sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTI.
Getliffe K; Fader M; Allen C; Pinar K; Moore KN
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 17505249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li L; Ye W; Ruan H; Yang B; Zhang S; Li L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):782-7. PubMed ID: 23168400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention.
Chartier-Kastler E; Denys P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Jan; 30(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 20928913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
