These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28117562)

  • 1. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
    Greene MF
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
    Swyers MH
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?
    Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The partial death of abortion rights.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court?
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Poppema ST
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Gartner EC
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S; Wyatt J
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The argument that never ends.
    Simon R
    US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court actions in anti-abortion protest cases.
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Apr; 9(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 10133587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.