These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28118379)

  • 1. Intergroup Contact and Outgroup Humanization: Is the Causal Relationship Uni- or Bidirectional?
    Capozza D; Di Bernardo GA; Falvo R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170554. PubMed ID: 28118379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-humanization enhances positive reactions to prosocial cross-group interaction.
    Borinca I; Tropp LR; Ofosu N
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2021 Jul; 60(3):1051-1074. PubMed ID: 33644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humanizing Outgroups Through Multiple Categorization: The Roles of Individuation and Threat.
    Prati F; Crisp RJ; Meleady R; Rubini M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Apr; 42(4):526-39. PubMed ID: 26984016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming attachment security and outgroup humanization: The mediation role of intergroup emotions.
    Capozza D; Falvo R; Di Bernardo GA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265714. PubMed ID: 35303033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization.
    Enock FE; Flavell JC; Tipper SP; Over H
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104682. PubMed ID: 33773426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From humanitarian aid to humanization: When outgroup, but not ingroup, helping increases humanization.
    Davies T; Yogeeswaran K; Verkuyten M; Loughnan S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207343. PubMed ID: 30481184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ours is human: on the pervasiveness of infra-humanization in intergroup relations.
    Paladino MP; Vaes J
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 48(Pt 2):237-51. PubMed ID: 18588747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human like me: Evidence that I-sharing humanizes the otherwise dehumanized.
    Pinel EC; Yawger GC; Long AE; Rampy N; Brenna R; Finnell SK
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Dec; 56(4):689-704. PubMed ID: 29197169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution.
    Enock FE; Tipper SP; Over H
    Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104865. PubMed ID: 34358774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.
    Kteily N; Hodson G; Bruneau E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 110(3):343-70. PubMed ID: 26963763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-humanization reduces prejudice, even under high intergroup threat.
    Pavetich M; Stathi S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):651-671. PubMed ID: 32700957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can intergroup contact improve humanity attributions?
    Capozza D; Trifiletti E; Vezzali L; Favara I
    Int J Psychol; 2013; 48(4):527-41. PubMed ID: 22721357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceiving mixed valence emotions reduces intergroup dehumanisation.
    Prati F; Giner-Sorolla R
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1018-1031. PubMed ID: 28952398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the impact of cross-group friendship on interactions with novel outgroup members.
    Page-Gould E; Mendoza-Denton R; Alegre JM; Siy JO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 May; 98(5):775-93. PubMed ID: 20438224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dehumanization after all: Distinguishing intergroup evalutation from trait-based dehumanization.
    Vaes J
    Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105329. PubMed ID: 36436445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.
    Crisp RJ; Turner RN
    Am Psychol; 2009; 64(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 19449982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?
    Cernat V
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(6):737-53. PubMed ID: 22208111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are they animals or machines? Measuring dehumanization.
    Martínez R; Rodríguez-Bailón R; Moya M
    Span J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 15(3):1110-22. PubMed ID: 23156919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vicarious intergroup contact and the role of authorities in prejudice reduction.
    Gómez A; Huici C
    Span J Psychol; 2008 May; 11(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 18630653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.