BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28118389)

  • 1. Rapid Design of Knowledge-Based Scoring Potentials for Enrichment of Near-Native Geometries in Protein-Protein Docking.
    Sasse A; de Vries SJ; Schindler CE; de BeauchĂȘne IC; Zacharias M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170625. PubMed ID: 28118389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys.
    Liang S; Meroueh SO; Wang G; Qiu C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 18831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting protein complex geometries with linear scoring functions.
    Demir-Kavuk O; Krull F; Chae MH; Knapp EW
    Genome Inform; 2010; 24():21-30. PubMed ID: 22081586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein-protein and peptide-protein docking and refinement using ATTRACT in CAPRI.
    Schindler CE; Chauvot de BeauchĂȘne I; de Vries SJ; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):391-398. PubMed ID: 27785830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible docking and refinement with a coarse-grained protein model using ATTRACT.
    de Vries S; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2167-74. PubMed ID: 23996217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CyClus: a fast, comprehensive cylindrical interface approximation clustering/reranking method for rigid-body protein-protein docking decoys.
    Omori S; Kitao A
    Proteins; 2013 Jun; 81(6):1005-16. PubMed ID: 23344972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully Blind Peptide-Protein Docking with pepATTRACT.
    Schindler CEM; de Vries SJ; Zacharias M
    Structure; 2015 Aug; 23(8):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 26146186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Score_set: a CAPRI benchmark for scoring protein complexes.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2014 Nov; 82(11):3163-9. PubMed ID: 25179222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions.
    Schneider S; Zacharias M
    J Mol Recognit; 2012 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 22213447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How different from random are docking predictions when ranked by scoring functions?
    Feliu E; Oliva B
    Proteins; 2010 Dec; 78(16):3376-85. PubMed ID: 20848549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. InterEvScore: a novel coarse-grained interface scoring function using a multi-body statistical potential coupled to evolution.
    Andreani J; Faure G; Guerois R
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jul; 29(14):1742-9. PubMed ID: 23652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Residue conservation information for generating near-native structures in protein-protein docking.
    Duan Y; Reddy BV; Kaznessis YN
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Aug; 4(4):793-806. PubMed ID: 17007068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of scoring schemes for protein docking.
    Heuser P; Schomburg D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():279. PubMed ID: 17678526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving ranking of models for protein complexes with side chain modeling and atomic potentials.
    Viswanath S; Ravikant DV; Elber R
    Proteins; 2013 Apr; 81(4):592-606. PubMed ID: 23180599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. iATTRACT: simultaneous global and local interface optimization for protein-protein docking refinement.
    Schindler CE; de Vries SJ; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2015 Feb; 83(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25402278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking.
    Liu S; Vakser IA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 12():280. PubMed ID: 21745398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.