528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28118659)
1. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy on Successful First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation Among ICU Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lascarrou JB; Boisrame-Helms J; Bailly A; Le Thuaut A; Kamel T; Mercier E; Ricard JD; Lemiale V; Colin G; Mira JP; Meziani F; Messika J; Dequin PF; Boulain T; Azoulay E; Champigneulle B; Reignier J;
JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(5):483-493. PubMed ID: 28118659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study.
Suzuki K; Kusunoki S; Tanigawa K; Shime N
BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e024927. PubMed ID: 30928937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Ruetzler K; Bustamante S; Schmidt MT; Almonacid-Cardenas F; Duncan A; Bauer A; Turan A; Skubas NJ; Sessler DI;
JAMA; 2024 Apr; 331(15):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 38497992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit: C-MAC video laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope.
Dey S; Pradhan D; Saikia P; Bhattacharyya P; Khandelwal H; Adarsha KN
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2020 Apr; 44(3):135-141. PubMed ID: 31780257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.
Trimmel H; Kreutziger J; Fitzka R; Szüts S; Derdak C; Koch E; Erwied B; Voelckel WG
Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e470-6. PubMed ID: 27002277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Patanwala AE; Dicken J
West J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 15(7):930-7. PubMed ID: 25493156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol.
Bailly A; Lascarrou JB; Le Thuaut A; Boisrame-Helms J; Kamel T; Mercier E; Ricard JD; Lemiale V; Champigneulle B; Reignier J;
BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e009855. PubMed ID: 26700287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The midline approach for endotracheal intubation using GlideScope video laryngoscopy could provide better glottis exposure in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Jiang L; Qiu S; Zhang P; Yao W; Chang Y; Dai Z
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):200. PubMed ID: 31690285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Video Laryngoscopy Improves Odds of First-Attempt Success at Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. A Propensity-matched Analysis.
Hypes CD; Stolz U; Sakles JC; Joshi RR; Natt B; Malo J; Bloom JW; Mosier JM
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Mar; 13(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 26653096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.
Prekker ME; Driver BE; Trent SA; Resnick-Ault D; Seitz KP; Russell DW; Gaillard JP; Latimer AJ; Ghamande SA; Gibbs KW; Vonderhaar DJ; Whitson MR; Barnes CR; Walco JP; Douglas IS; Krishnamoorthy V; Dagan A; Bastman JJ; Lloyd BD; Gandotra S; Goranson JK; Mitchell SH; White HD; Palakshappa JA; Espinera A; Page DB; Joffe A; Hansen SJ; Hughes CG; George T; Herbert JT; Shapiro NI; Schauer SG; Long BJ; Imhoff B; Wang L; Rhoads JP; Womack KN; Janz DR; Self WH; Rice TW; Ginde AA; Casey JD; Semler MW;
N Engl J Med; 2023 Aug; 389(5):418-429. PubMed ID: 37326325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison Between Direct and Video-assisted Laryngoscopy for Intubations in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Eisenberg MA; Green-Hopkins I; Werner H; Nagler J
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 27208690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.
Gu Y; Robert J; Kovacs G; Milne AD; Morris I; Hung O; MacQuarrie K; Mackinnon S; Adam Law J
Can J Anaesth; 2016 Aug; 63(8):928-37. PubMed ID: 27090535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The C-MAC® video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first-attempt intubations in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Mosier JM; Patanwala AE; Dicken JM; Kalin L; Javedani PP
J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 48(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 25498851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. First-attempt success rate of video laryngoscopy in small infants (VISI): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Garcia-Marcinkiewicz AG; Kovatsis PG; Hunyady AI; Olomu PN; Zhang B; Sathyamoorthy M; Gonzalez A; Kanmanthreddy S; Gálvez JA; Franz AM; Peyton J; Park R; Kiss EE; Sommerfield D; Griffis H; Nishisaki A; von Ungern-Sternberg BS; Nadkarni VM; McGowan FX; Fiadjoe JE;
Lancet; 2020 Dec; 396(10266):1905-1913. PubMed ID: 33308472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Airway risk factors for the Miller laryngoscope blade.
Landry WB; Nossaman BD
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():62-7. PubMed ID: 27555135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Su YC; Chen CC; Lee YK; Lee JY; Lin KJ
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):788-95. PubMed ID: 21897263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
