These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28118954)

  • 1. Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?
    Kang BM; Park YK; Park SJ; Lee KY; Kim CW; Lee SH
    Asian J Surg; 2018 May; 41(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 28118954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?
    Beaufrère A; Guedj N; Maggiori L; Patroni A; Bedossa P; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 19(11):O377-O385. PubMed ID: 28941054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of whole-mount and conventional sections for pathological mesorectal extension and circumferential resection margin assessment after total mesorectal excision.
    Giner F; Frasson M; Cholewa H; Sancho-Muriel J; García-Gómez E; Hernández JA; Flor-Lorente B; García-Granero E
    Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Aug; 102(8):417-425. PubMed ID: 38373616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive Factors and Risk Model for Positive Circumferential Resection Margin Rate After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in 2653 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Roodbeen SX; de Lacy FB; van Dieren S; Penna M; Ris F; Moran B; Tekkis P; Bemelman WA; Hompes R;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):884-891. PubMed ID: 31634183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision.
    Lee SH; Hernandez de Anda E; Finne CO; Madoff RD; Garcia-Aguilar J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2249-57. PubMed ID: 16400512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of circumferential resection margins on survival following rectal cancer surgery.
    Mois E; Graur F; Hajjar NA; Puia C; Cote A; Zaharie F; Bartos A; Momani NA; Pop F; Neagos H; Ciorogar G; Iancu C
    Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():. PubMed ID: 27941239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
    de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
    Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors related to preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin and the extent of mesorectal invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a prospective comparison study.
    Kim YW; Cha SW; Pyo J; Kim NK; Min BS; Kim MJ; Kim H
    World J Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(9):1952-60. PubMed ID: 19603224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of mesorectal fascia in mid and low anterior rectal cancer using endorectal ultrasound is feasible and reliable: a comparison with MRI findings.
    Granero-Castro P; Muñoz E; Frasson M; García-Granero A; Esclapez P; Campos S; Flor-Lorente B; Garcia-Granero E
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jun; 57(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 24807595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sparing Sphincters and Laparoscopic Resection Improve Survival by Optimizing the Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Patients.
    Keskin M; Bayraktar A; Sivirikoz E; Yegen G; Karip B; Saglam E; Bulut MT; Balik E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(5):e2669. PubMed ID: 26844498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
    Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
    Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of circumferential resection margin in patients with middle and lower rectal carcinoma.
    Wu ZY; Wan J; Li JH; Zhao G; Peng L; Yao Y; Du JL; Liu QF; Wang ZD; Huang ZM; Lin HH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jun; 13(24):3380-3. PubMed ID: 17659680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and MRI for prediction of circumferential resection margin (CRM) for rectal cancer.
    Tsai C; Hague C; Xiong W; Raval M; Karimuddin A; Brown C; Phang PT
    Am J Surg; 2017 May; 213(5):936-942. PubMed ID: 28391975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation Between Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting the Circumferential Resection Margin in Patients With Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.
    Ye D; Zhu Z; Chen F; Lie C; Li W; Lin Y; Qiu S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Mar; 39(3):569-577. PubMed ID: 31617244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mode of circumferential margin involvement in rectal cancer determines its impact on outcomes: A population-based study.
    Hugen N; Voorham QJM; Beets GL; Loughrey MB; Snaebjornsson P; Nagtegaal ID
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108598. PubMed ID: 39154428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer.
    Hiranyakas A; da Silva G; Wexner SD; Ho YH; Allende D; Berho M
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22776435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
    Depypere L; Moons J; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Peters C; Sagaert X; Coosemans W; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 29036407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.