These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2811940)

  • 1. The Webster decision: what will it do to nursing?
    NAACOG Newsl; 1989 Sep; 16(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 2811940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
    Smolin DM
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion PRO: the abortion controversy: will it ever disappear? CON: should we change our attitudes about abortion?
    Burnhill MS; Brendlinger DL
    J Med Soc N J; 1980 Jun; 77(6):450-53. PubMed ID: 6930500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is abortion a religious issue? 3. The irrelevance of religion in the abortion debate.
    Newton L
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Aug; 8(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 689866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judicial standard of review and Webster.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):211-6. PubMed ID: 2603864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion.
    Werhane PH
    Theor Med; 1984 Oct; 5(3):360-3. PubMed ID: 6537665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late abortion and technological advances in fetal viability.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 3842806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Professional nursing and the abortion decisions.
    Regan WA
    Pa Nurse; 1973 May; 28(3):7. PubMed ID: 4220294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mississippi physicians' attitudes toward the Supreme Court abortion decision.
    Murray PT; Jew H
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1974 Jul; 15(7):291-4. PubMed ID: 4841121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legislating family values: an historical commentary on the parental consent requirement in the Casey decision.
    Prescott HM
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):32-6. PubMed ID: 8118133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion ruling divides the United States.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6229):83. PubMed ID: 2739742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congress to reexamine antiabortion amendment.
    Holden C
    Science; 1981 Jul; 213(4506):421. PubMed ID: 7244639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letter: Abortion.
    Introcaso DA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 45(2):234-5. PubMed ID: 1118099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induced abortion: nursing attitudes and action.
    Fonseca JD
    Am J Nurs; 1968 May; 68(5):1022-7. PubMed ID: 5184646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposed abortion laws analyzed by the College.
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983; 3(7):1, 26. PubMed ID: 10263083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion, the hospital and the law.
    Phillips DF
    Hospitals; 1970 Aug; 44(16):59-62. PubMed ID: 5432656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: issue of the shadows, dilemma of antiquity.
    Kennedy RB
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1967 Nov; 8(11):661-5. PubMed ID: 6075614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. States legislate abortion reform, but hospitals are reluctant to comply.
    Plagenz L
    Mod Hosp; 1969 Jul; 113(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 5796508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What physicians need to know about the legal status of abortion in the United States.
    Weitz TA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 52(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 19407519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.