346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28120065)
21. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.
Fiaschi P; Pavanello M; Imperato A; Dallolio V; Accogli A; Capra V; Consales A; Cama A; Piatelli G
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 17(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26824593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty.
Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CR; Geelhoed E
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 26991387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents.
Williams L; Fan K; Bentley R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 44(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27174495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The "springform" technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants.
Pöppe JP; Spendel M; Schwartz C; Winkler PA; Wittig J
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2022 Mar; 164(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 34873659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Management of decompressive craniectomy defects: modern military treatment strategies.
Tantawi D; Armonda R; Valerio I; Kumar AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2042-5. PubMed ID: 23154344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Complex skull defects reconstruction with САD/САМ titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.
Eolchiyan SA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2014; 78(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 25406805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.
Anchieta MV; Salles FA; Cassaro BD; Quaresma MM; Santos BF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1919-25. PubMed ID: 27167515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In Situ Cranioplasty Technique for Immediate Calvarial Reconstruction to Optimize Cosmesis.
Gallia GL
World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():535-9. PubMed ID: 26875659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of locally manufactured patient-specific custom made implants for cranial defects using a silicone mould.
Vlok AJ; Naidoo S; Kamat AS; Lamprecht D
S Afr J Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 30264941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material.
Pompili A; Caroli F; Carpanese L; Caterino M; Raus L; Sestili G; Occhipinti E
J Neurosurg; 1998 Aug; 89(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 9688118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Customized Technique of Cranioplasty for Patients with Large Skull Defects: A Technical Note.
Metwali H; Hassanin M; Ibrahim T
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():110-114. PubMed ID: 33422719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 3d cranial reconstruction using titanium implant - a case report.
Selvaraj S; Dorairaj J; Shivasankar N
Afr Health Sci; 2022 Sep; 22(3):383-390. PubMed ID: 36910405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Classical versus custom orbital wall reconstruction: Selected factors regarding surgery and hospitalization.
Zieliński R; Malińska M; Kozakiewicz M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):710-715. PubMed ID: 28318927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cosmetic and Neuroprotective Placement of Custom-Made Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Cranial Plate (SKULPIO) in Single-Step Surgery: Technical Note and Case Report.
Oishi T; Sameshima T; Totsuka T; Yamasaki T; Koizumi S; Namba H
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():187-191. PubMed ID: 31299307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [PEEK customized implant for skull esthetic reconstruction].
Foletti JM; Lari N; Dumas P; Compes P; Guyot L
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2012 Dec; 113(6):468-71. PubMed ID: 23182690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Custom made cranioplasty prostheses in porous hydroxy-apatite using 3D design techniques: 7 years experience in 25 patients.
Staffa G; Nataloni A; Compagnone C; Servadei F
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2007 Feb; 149(2):161-70; discussion 170. PubMed ID: 17242849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defects.
Heuser L; Machtens E; Massberg W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 28(4):314-5. PubMed ID: 10416903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
