177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28120551)
1. Fabrication and characterization of shape memory polyurethane porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Yu J; Xia H; Teramoto A; Ni QQ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Apr; 105(4):1132-1137. PubMed ID: 28120551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on mechanical behavior and biological performance of porous shape memory polyurethane scaffolds.
Yu J; Xia H; Teramoto A; Ni QQ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Jan; 106(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 28880433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fabrication of 3D porous SF/β-TCP hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue reconstruction.
Park HJ; Min KD; Lee MC; Kim SH; Lee OJ; Ju HW; Moon BM; Lee JM; Park YR; Kim DW; Jeong JY; Park CH
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Jul; 104(7):1779-87. PubMed ID: 26999521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds.
Janik H; Marzec M
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Mar; 48():586-91. PubMed ID: 25579961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indirect three-dimensional printing: A method for fabricating polyurethane-urea based cardiac scaffolds.
Hernández-Córdova R; Mathew DA; Balint R; Carrillo-Escalante HJ; Cervantes-Uc JM; Hidalgo-Bastida LA; Hernández-Sánchez F
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Aug; 104(8):1912-21. PubMed ID: 26991636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D biodegradable shape changing composite scaffold with programmable porous structures for bone engineering.
Chen X; Huang Z; Yang Q; Zeng X; Bai R; Wang L
Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 36394305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessments for bone regeneration using the polycaprolactone SLUP (salt-leaching using powder) scaffold.
Cho YS; Hong MW; Quan M; Kim SY; Lee SH; Lee SJ; Kim YY; Cho YS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Dec; 105(12):3432-3444. PubMed ID: 28879670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrospun polyurethane/hydroxyapatite bioactive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: the role of solvent and hydroxyapatite particles.
Tetteh G; Khan AS; Delaine-Smith RM; Reilly GC; Rehman IU
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():95-110. PubMed ID: 25117379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic characterization of porosity and mass transport and mechanical properties of porous polyurethane scaffolds.
Wang YF; Barrera CM; Dauer EA; Gu W; Andreopoulos F; Huang CC
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jan; 65():657-664. PubMed ID: 27741496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of hydrodynamic pressure on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stromal cells seeded on polyurethane scaffolds.
Tang X; Teng S; Liu C; Jagodzinski M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Dec; 105(12):3445-3455. PubMed ID: 28869710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fabrication and characterization of waterborne biodegradable polyurethanes 3-dimensional porous scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering.
Jiang X; Yu F; Wang Z; Li J; Tan H; Ding M; Fu Q
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2010; 21(12):1637-52. PubMed ID: 20537246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nanohydroxyapatite/poly(ester urethane) scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Boissard CI; Bourban PE; Tami AE; Alini M; Eglin D
Acta Biomater; 2009 Nov; 5(9):3316-27. PubMed ID: 19442765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repair of critical size bone defects with porous poly(D,L-lactide)/nacre nanocomposite hollow scaffold.
Xiao WD; Zhong ZM; Tang YZ; Xu ZX; Xu Z; Chen JT
Saudi Med J; 2012 Jun; 33(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 22729113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyurethane scaffold formation via a combination of salt leaching and thermally induced phase separation.
Heijkants RG; van Calck RV; van Tienen TG; de Groot JH; Pennings AJ; Buma P; Veth RP; Schouten AJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Dec; 87(4):921-32. PubMed ID: 18228268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving mechanical and biological properties of macroporous HA scaffolds through composite coatings.
Zhao J; Lu X; Duan K; Guo LY; Zhou SB; Weng J
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2009 Nov; 74(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 19679453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poly(ester-urethane) scaffolds: effect of structure on properties and osteogenic activity of stem cells.
Kiziltay A; Marcos-Fernandez A; San Roman J; Sousa RA; Reis RL; Hasirci V; Hasirci N
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2015 Aug; 9(8):930-42. PubMed ID: 24376070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fabrication of electrospun thermoplastic polyurethane blended poly (l-lactide-co-e-caprolactone) microyarn scaffolds for engineering of female pelvic-floor tissue.
Hou M; Wu Q; Dai M; Xu P; Gu C; Jia X; Feng J; Mo X
Biomed Mater; 2014 Dec; 10(1):015005. PubMed ID: 25546879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A 3D bioprinted in situ conjugated-co-fabricated scaffold for potential bone tissue engineering applications.
Sithole MN; Kumar P; du Toit LC; Marimuthu T; Choonara YE; Pillay V
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 May; 106(5):1311-1321. PubMed ID: 29316290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of 3D porous TCP-coated and non-coated alumina scaffolds.
Kim YH; Anirban JM; Song HY; Seo HS; Lee BT
J Biomater Appl; 2011 Feb; 25(6):539-58. PubMed ID: 20207781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interactions of coronary artery smooth muscle cells with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds.
Grenier S; Sandig M; Holdsworth DW; Mequanint K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 May; 89(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 18431771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
