641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28122393)
1. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nerve Sparing during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Increases the Risk of Ipsilateral Positive Surgical Margins.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Stomps S; Witjes JA; van Basten JPA
J Urol; 2020 Jul; 204(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 31971494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of nerve sparing in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the risk of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence.
Komori H; Blas L; Shiota M; Takamatsu D; Matsumoto T; Lee K; Monji K; Kashiwagi E; Inokuchi J; Eto M
Int J Urol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):824-829. PubMed ID: 35411637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Gondo T; Takeuchi H; Nakagami Y; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 23418870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.
Lee J; Kim HY; Goh HJ; Heo JE; Almujalhem A; Alqahtani AA; Chung DY; Chang K; Choi YD; Rha KH
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 31347951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?
Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using near-infrared fluorescence technology and indocyanine green: initial experience.
Mangano MS; De Gobbi A; Beniamin F; Lamon C; Ciaccia M; Maccatrozzo L
Urologia; 2018 Feb; 85(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 28574144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative investigation on clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between experienced open prostatic surgeons and novice open surgeons in a laparoscopically naïve center with a limited caseload.
Sumitomo M; Kanao K; Kato Y; Yoshizawa T; Watanabe M; Zennami K; Nakamura K
Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 25721437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
