These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28122393)

  • 1. Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.
    Tatsugami K; Yoshioka K; Shiroki R; Eto M; Yoshino Y; Tozawa K; Fukasawa S; Fujisawa M; Takenaka A; Nasu Y; Kashiwagi A; Gotoh M; Terachi T;
    Int J Urol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28122393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nerve Sparing during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Increases the Risk of Ipsilateral Positive Surgical Margins.
    Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Stomps S; Witjes JA; van Basten JPA
    J Urol; 2020 Jul; 204(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 31971494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
    Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
    J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of nerve sparing in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the risk of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence.
    Komori H; Blas L; Shiota M; Takamatsu D; Matsumoto T; Lee K; Monji K; Kashiwagi E; Inokuchi J; Eto M
    Int J Urol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):824-829. PubMed ID: 35411637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.
    Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Gondo T; Takeuchi H; Nakagami Y; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
    Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 23418870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
    Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retzius Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Conveys Early Regain of Continence over Conventional Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,863 Patients.
    Lee J; Kim HY; Goh HJ; Heo JE; Almujalhem A; Alqahtani AA; Chung DY; Chang K; Choi YD; Rha KH
    J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 31347951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
    Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
    Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration.
    Bravi CA; Dell'Oglio P; Piazza P; Scarcella S; Bianchi L; Falagario U; Turri F; Andras I; Di Maida F; De Groote R; Piramide F; Moschovas MC; Suardi N; Terrone C; Carrieri G; Patel V; Autorino R; Porpiglia F; Vickers A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Mottrie A; Larcher A;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 7(4):821-828. PubMed ID: 38036328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic and robot-assisted radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy conducted by surgeons with total caseloads of over 1000 prostatectomies].
    Pushkar DY; Dyakov VV; Vasilyev AO; Kotenko DV
    Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):50-53. PubMed ID: 28394523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
    Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
    J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial.
    Chang KD; Abdel Raheem A; Choi YD; Chung BH; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 29645348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy using near-infrared fluorescence technology and indocyanine green: initial experience.
    Mangano MS; De Gobbi A; Beniamin F; Lamon C; Ciaccia M; Maccatrozzo L
    Urologia; 2018 Feb; 85(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 28574144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.