These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28122554)

  • 1. Evaluating on-line health information for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a descriptive study.
    Vivekanantham A; Protheroe J; Muller S; Hider S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 28122554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
    Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.
    Raja H; Patel K
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.
    Oloidi A; Nduaguba SO; Obamiro K
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 35():70. PubMed ID: 32537073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients.
    Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
    Shetty KR; Wong K; Hashemi S; Shetty A; Levi JR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han A; Carayannopoulos AG
    PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dr Google - assessing the reliability and readability of information on general surgical procedures found via search engines.
    Ramli R; Jambor MA; Kong CY
    ANZ J Surg; 2023 Mar; 93(3):590-596. PubMed ID: 36716246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Headache" Online Information: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, Credibility, and Content.
    Bukhari A; Alshihri S; Abualenain M; Barton J; Kupsky G; Pines JM; Pourmand A
    Perm J; 2021 May; 25():. PubMed ID: 33970074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.
    Sax L; Razak A; Shetty K; Cohen M; Levi J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():168-174. PubMed ID: 31326734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A readability assessment of online stroke information.
    Sharma N; Tridimas A; Fitzsimmons PR
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(6):1362-7. PubMed ID: 24389374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
    Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
    Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.