These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28122554)

  • 21. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
    Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?
    Valizadeh-Haghi S; Khazaal Y; Rahmatizadeh S
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 33424467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How Readable Is BPH Treatment Information on the Internet? Assessing Barriers to Literacy in Prostate Health.
    Koo K; Yap RL
    Am J Mens Health; 2017 Mar; 11(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 27903952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
    Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
    Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Information about oral cancer on the Internet: our patients cannot understand it.
    Varela-Centelles P; Ledesma-Ludi Y; Seoane-Romero JM; Seoane J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 25703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the Informational Content, Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Health Information on Monogenic Diabetes.
    Guan Y; Maloney KA; Roter DL; Pollin TI
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Jun; 27(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28951986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Partial Tonsillectomy.
    Wong K; Levi JR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2017 Mar; 126(3):192-198. PubMed ID: 27932524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability, reliability and credibility of online patient information on skin grafts.
    Heaven CL; Patel C; Ahmadi O; Mathy JA
    Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):e57-e64. PubMed ID: 36354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A systematic review of internet-based information on dermatomyositis and polymyositis.
    Haque A; Cox M; Sandler RD; Hughes M
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 32812386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.