These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28124353)

  • 1. The effect of preparatory technique on the compressive properties of morsellised bone graft.
    Gozzard C; Grimm B; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Hip Int; 2002; 12(2):116-118. PubMed ID: 28124353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical characteristics of impacted morsellised bone grafts used in revision of total hip arthroplasty.
    Giesen EB; Lamerigts NM; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Schreurs BW; Huiskes R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Nov; 81(6):1052-7. PubMed ID: 10615985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morsellised sawbones is an acceptable experimental substitute for the in vitro elastic and viscoelastic mechanical characterisation of morsellised cancellous bone undergoing impaction grafting.
    Ayers MP; Clift SE; Gheduzzi S
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jan; 36(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 24075067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple technique for defatting morsellised bone graft in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Chapman TW; Charnley GJ
    Hip Int; 2002; 12(4):403-404. PubMed ID: 28124345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impacted bone stiffness measured during construction of morsellised bone samples.
    Fosse L; Rønningen H; Lund-Larsen J; Benum P; Grande L
    J Biomech; 2004 Nov; 37(11):1757-66. PubMed ID: 15388319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autologous morsellised bone grafting restores uncontained femoral bone defects in knee arthroplasty. An in vivo study in horses.
    van Loon CJ; de Waal Malefijt MC; Buma P; Stolk T; Verdonschot N; Tromp AM; Huiskes R; Barneveld A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2000 Apr; 82(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 10813186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutive models for impacted morsellised cortico-cancellous bone.
    Phillips A; Pankaj P; May F; Taylor K; Howie C; Usmani A
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(9):2162-70. PubMed ID: 16309740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.
    Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Onishi E; Nakamura T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17259411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of the mechanical properties of impacted morsellised bone grafts.
    Płomiński J; Watral Z; Kwiatkowski K
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 7(5):533-42. PubMed ID: 17611446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of irradiated allograft in a paediatric population: an Indian experience.
    Johari A; Shingade V; Gajiwala AL; Shah V; D'Lima C
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2007; 8(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 16804649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of early and late infection in revision hip arthroplasty with impacted morsellised bone allograft technique.
    El-Kawy S; Hay D; Acton D; Drabu K
    Hip Int; 2004; 14(4):239-243. PubMed ID: 28247398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viscoelastic modelling of impacted morsellised bone accurately describes unloading behaviour: an experimental study of stiffness moduli and recoil properties.
    Fosse L; Muller S; Rønningen H; Irgens F; Benum P
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2295-302. PubMed ID: 16169553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure during compaction of morsellised bone gives an increase in stiffness: an in vitro study.
    Lunde KB; Kaehler N; Rønningen H; Fosse L
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):231-4. PubMed ID: 17692853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the viscoelastic properties of bone grafts.
    Datta A; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 16713046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties.
    Schreurs BW; Slooff TJ; Buma P; Gardeniers JW; Huiskes R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 May; 80(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 9619924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical tip: a useful aid for the preparation of morsellised bone graft.
    Hart WJ; Mehra A; Pradhan N; Hodgkinson JP
    Hip Int; 2006; 16(4):312-3. PubMed ID: 19219811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.
    Villatte G; Erivan R; Salles G; Pereira B; Galvin M; Descamps S; Boisgard S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 28366746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral component revision using impacted morsellised cancellous graft. A biomechanical study of implant stability.
    Malkani AL; Voor MJ; Fee KA; Bates CS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Nov; 78(6):973-8. PubMed ID: 8951018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.
    Lim TH; Kwon H; Jeon CH; Kim JG; Sokolowski M; Natarajan R; An HS; Andersson GB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(8):951-6. PubMed ID: 11317120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral component revision using impacted morsellised cancellous graft.
    Ling RS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Sep; 79(5):874-5. PubMed ID: 9331052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.