224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28125627)
1. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jiang Y; Chen C; Li L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170587. PubMed ID: 28125627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?
Munro A; Leung Y; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Semmens J; Codde J; Williams V; O'Leary P; Steel N; Cohen P
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 25769659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Excisional treatment in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial to compare AIS persistence/recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold knife cone biopsy: protocol for a pilot study.
Cohen PA; Brand A; Sykes P; Wrede DCH; McNally O; Eva L; Rao A; Campion M; Stockler M; Powell A; Codde J; Bulsara MK; Anderson L; Leung Y; Farrell L; Stoyles P
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017576. PubMed ID: 28851799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jiang YM; Chen CX; Li L
Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():3907-15. PubMed ID: 27418835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical significance of loop electrosurgical excisional procedure in diagnosis and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinoma].
Song Y; Wang Q; Sui L; Gao SJ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 29609232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence and risk factors for residual cervical neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP or conization.
Natee J; Therasakvichaya S; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 16519377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Costales AB; Milbourne AM; Rhodes HE; Munsell MF; Wallbillich JJ; Brown J; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM; Schmeler KM
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 23541795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Wang XI; Huang F; Zhang S
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Nov; 47(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 29263039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Cai L; Huang Y; Lin C; Liu G; Mao X; Dong B; Lu T; Sun P
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 9(2):949-957. PubMed ID: 35117440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
