255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28125627)
21. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in women with high-risk HPV persistent infection after cervical conization.
Wang L; Liu X; Zhang J; Huang Y; Liu Y; Jia L; Zhang Y; Jia L
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103144. PubMed ID: 36210038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Management and long-term outcomes of women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: A retrospective study.
Tan JHJ; Malloy MJ; Thangamani R; Gertig D; Drennan KT; Wrede CD; Saville M; Quinn M
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 31578727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Kehar R; Gandhi S; Chen Y; Cheung A; Hopkins J; Khatib R; Ma B; Mustafa AA; Lloyd N; Wu D; Broutet N; Schünemann HJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 26643302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Conservative Treatment for Patients with Carcinoma in Situ-Positive Margins After a Loop Electroexcisional Procedure: Is It Safe?
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee YS; Cho YL; Park JY; Hong DG
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(1-2):37-44. PubMed ID: 29999280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife conization on pregnancy outcomes.
Guo HJ; Guo RX; Liu YL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 23590007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization.
Panna S; Luanratanakorn S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 19827885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Liu Y; Qiu HF; Tang Y; Chen J; Lv J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 24752130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias].
Hillemanns P; Kimmig R; Dannecker C; Noorzai T; Diebold J; Thaler CJ; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10785949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cold knife conization vs. LEEP. Are they the same procedure?
Fanning J; Padratzik J
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 11838307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Compliance after loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold knife cone biopsy.
Greenspan DL; Faubion M; Coonrod DV; Hart KW; Mathieson K
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):675-80. PubMed ID: 17766617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.
Zhang X; Tong J; Ma X; Yu H; Guan X; Li J; Yang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(49):e23411. PubMed ID: 33285731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the efficacy and complications of different surgical methods for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 22873094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recurrent Dysplasia After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: Local Versus General Anesthesia.
Tzur Y; Berkovitz-Shperling R; Laskov I; Grisaru D; Michaan N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):315-318. PubMed ID: 35997172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 20003783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
