112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28126421)
1. A novel fully automatic measurement of apparent breast volume from trunk surface mesh.
Seoud L; Ramsay J; Parent S; Cheriet F
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Mar; 41():46-54. PubMed ID: 28126421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Breast Asymmetry in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using an Automated 3D Body Surface Measurement Technique.
Ramsay J; Seoud L; Barchi S; Cheriet F; Joncas J; Turgeon I; Debanné P; Trop I; Labelle H; Parent S
Spine Deform; 2017 May; 5(3):152-158. PubMed ID: 28449957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging].
Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a software for automatic delineation of the mammary gland and organs at risk in patients treated for breast cancer in lateral position.
Msika R; Tkatchenko N; Robilliard M; Fourquet A; Kirova Y
Cancer Radiother; 2020 Dec; 24(8):799-804. PubMed ID: 33046361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design.
Coltman CE; McGhee DE; Steele JR
Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 27066812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic atlas-based segmentation of the breast in MRI for 3D breast volume computation.
Ortiz CG; Martel AL
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5835-48. PubMed ID: 23039622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computation of breast ptosis from 3D surface scans of the female torso.
Li D; Cheong A; Reece GP; Crosby MA; Fingeret MC; Merchant FA
Comput Biol Med; 2016 Nov; 78():18-28. PubMed ID: 27643463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions.
Reece GP; Merchant F; Andon J; Khatam H; Ravi-Chandar K; Weston J; Fingeret MC; Lane C; Duncan K; Markey MK
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 25703742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy of breast volume calculation from 3D surface imaging data using statistical shape models.
Göpper MW; Neubauer J; Kalash Z; Stark GB; Simunovic F
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0233586. PubMed ID: 33232326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Breast Target Volume Delineation in Prone and Supine Positions.
Pogson EM; Delaney GP; Ahern V; Boxer MM; Chan C; David S; Dimigen M; Harvey JA; Koh ES; Lim K; Papadatos G; Yap ML; Batumalai V; Lazarus E; Dundas K; Shafiq J; Liney G; Moran C; Metcalfe P; Holloway L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(4):905-912. PubMed ID: 27788960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific anisotropic model of human trunk based on MR data.
Courchesne O; Guibault F; Parent S; Cheriet F
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 31(9):e02724. PubMed ID: 25981718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor.
Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fully automatic scheme for measuring liver volume in 3D MR images.
Le TN; Bao PT; Huynh HT
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1361-9. PubMed ID: 26405897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volume measurements of individual muscles in human quadriceps femoris using atlas-based segmentation approaches.
Le Troter A; Fouré A; Guye M; Confort-Gouny S; Mattei JP; Gondin J; Salort-Campana E; Bendahan D
MAGMA; 2016 Apr; 29(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 26983429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla.
Fallah F; Machann J; Martirosian P; Bamberg F; Schick F; Yang B
MAGMA; 2017 Apr; 30(2):139-151. PubMed ID: 27638089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic localization of solid organs on 3D CT images by a collaborative majority voting decision based on ensemble learning.
Zhou X; Wang S; Chen H; Hara T; Yokoyama R; Kanematsu M; Fujita H
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Jun; 36(4):304-13. PubMed ID: 22421130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
