BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2812646)

  • 1. An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims.
    Rosenblatt RA; Hurst A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):710-4. PubMed ID: 2812646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.
    Brown TW; McCarthy ML; Kelen GD; Levy F
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 May; 17(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 20536812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do falls and falls-injuries in hospital indicate negligent care -- and how big is the risk? A retrospective analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority Database of clinical negligence claims, resulting from falls in hospitals in England 1995 to 2006.
    Oliver D; Killick S; Even T; Willmott M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Dec; 17(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 19064658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perinatal medical negligence closed claims from the St. Paul Company, 1980-1982.
    Ogburn PL; Julian TM; Brooker DC; Joseph MS; Butler JC; Williams PP; Anderson ML; Shepard AC; Ogburn SL; Preisler WC
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 3172061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.
    Brennan TA; Sox CM; Burstin HR
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Dec; 335(26):1963-7. PubMed ID: 8960477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.
    Studdert DM; Mello MM; Gawande AA; Gandhi TK; Kachalia A; Yoon C; Puopolo AL; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2006 May; 354(19):2024-33. PubMed ID: 16687715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia: a closed claims analysis.
    Davies JM; Posner KL; Lee LA; Cheney FW; Domino KB
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jan; 110(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 19104180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical malpractice in urology, 1985 to 2004: 469 consecutive cases closed with indemnity payment.
    Perrotti M; Badger W; Prader S; Moran ME
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2154-7; discussion 2157. PubMed ID: 17070281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical models of outcome in malpractice lawsuits involving death or neurologically impaired infants.
    Bors-Koefoed R; Zylstra S; Resseguie LJ; Ricci BA; Kelly EE; Mondor MC
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 9642609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Urological medical malpractice.
    Kahan SE; Goldman HB; Marengo S; Resnick MI
    J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1638-42. PubMed ID: 11342944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Professional liability claims and Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists members: myth versus reality.
    Chauhan SP; Chauhan VB; Cowan BD; Hendrix NW; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1820-6; discussion 1826-8. PubMed ID: 15970818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missed diagnoses by urologists resulting in malpractice payment.
    Badger WJ; Moran ME; Abraham C; Yarlagadda B; Perrotti M
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2537-9. PubMed ID: 17937958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of obstetrics and gynecology professional liability claims in Catalonia, Spain (1986-2010).
    Gómez-Durán EL; Mulà-Rosías JA; Lailla-Vicens JM; Benet-Travé J; Arimany-Manso J
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Jul; 20(5):442-6. PubMed ID: 23756513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the obstetric malpractice claims filed by Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients.
    Baldwin LM; Greer T; Wu R; Hart G; Lloyd M; Rosenblatt RA
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 1462796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Most of the complaints in gynecology and obstetrics care are generated by perceptions stemming from unavoidable results].
    Morales Ramírez JJ; Sauceda González LF
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2001 Mar; 69():108-17. PubMed ID: 11387879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of physicians with obstetric malpractice claims experience.
    Baldwin LM; Larson EH; Hart LG; Greer T; Lloyd M; Rosenblatt RA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 1945206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of obstetric malpractice closed claims: profile of event.
    Julian TM; Brooker DC; Butler JC; Joseph MS; Ogburn PL; Williams PP; Anderson ML; Shepard AC; Preisler WC; Capell ML
    Am J Perinatol; 1985 Oct; 2(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 4052185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical malpractice in California: res judicata.
    Barthel ER; Stabile BE; Plurad D; Kim D; Neville A; Bricker S; Putnam B; Bongard F
    Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):1007-11. PubMed ID: 25264649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical malpractice and rhinology.
    Dawson DE; Kraus EM
    Am J Rhinol; 2007; 21(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 17999795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers.
    Rogers SO; Gawande AA; Kwaan M; Puopolo AL; Yoon C; Brennan TA; Studdert DM
    Surgery; 2006 Jul; 140(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 16857439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.