These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28126490)

  • 1. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying stimuli that cue multiple responses triggers the congruency sequence effect independent of response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Colter KM; Grant LD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):677-689. PubMed ID: 28095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.
    Marini F; Demeter E; Roberts KC; Chelazzi L; Woldorff MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 26791226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
    Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Weissman DH; Jiang J; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2022-2037. PubMed ID: 25089574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task sets serve as boundaries for the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Cookson SL; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):798-812. PubMed ID: 32324028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional blink suppresses both stimulus-driven and representation-driven cross-modal spread of attention.
    Zhao S; Feng C; Liao Y; Huang X; Feng W
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Apr; 58(4):e13761. PubMed ID: 33400294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The congruency sequence effect emerges when the distracter precedes the target.
    Weissman DH; Egner T; Hawks Z; Link J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():8-21. PubMed ID: 25616120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rethinking attentional reset: Task sets determine the boundaries of adaptive control.
    Grant LD; Cerpa SR; Weissman DH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1171-1185. PubMed ID: 34507511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct cognitive control mechanisms as revealed by modality-specific conflict adaptation effects.
    Yang G; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Li Q; Liu X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):807-818. PubMed ID: 28345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The congruency sequence effect in a modified prime-probe task indexes response-general control.
    Weissman DH; Grant LD; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1387-1396. PubMed ID: 32881553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.