These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28127539)

  • 1. The genial tubercle: A prospective novel landmark for the diagnosis of mandibular asymmetry.
    Lee SY; Choi DS; Jang I; Song GS; Cha BK
    Korean J Orthod; 2017 Jan; 47(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 28127539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric measurements performed on CBCT and reconstructed lateral cephalograms: a cross-sectional study providing a quantitative approach of differences and bias.
    Baldini B; Cavagnetto D; Baselli G; Sforza C; Tartaglia GM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):98. PubMed ID: 35351080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21459833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of mandibular morphology measurements on cone-beam computed tomography-synthesized cephalograms with random head positioning errors.
    Lin HS; Chen YJ; Lu HL; Lu TW; Chen CC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):62. PubMed ID: 28558778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating mandibular symphysis bone density according to various skeletal patterns with CBCT.
    Gousman J; Park JH; Chae JM
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 32599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
    Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
    Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.
    Hwang SA; Lee JS; Hwang HS; Lee KM
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 30603623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo.
    Chien PC; Parks ET; Eraso F; Hartsfield JK; Roberts WE; Ofner S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jul; 38(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 19474253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
    Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study.
    Li C; Teixeira H; Tanna N; Zheng Z; Chen SHY; Zou M; Chung CH
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of Frankfort horizontal plane on 3D multi-planar reconstructed MR images.
    Daboul A; Schwahn C; Schaffner G; Soehnel S; Samietz S; Aljaghsi A; Habes M; Hegenscheid K; Puls R; Klinke T; Biffar R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48281. PubMed ID: 23118970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location of the genial tubercle.
    Hueman EM; Noujeim ME; Langlais RP; Prihoda TJ; Miller FR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jul; 137(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 17599577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of the deviation of the menton on posteroanterior cephalograms and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Lee HJ; Lee S; Lee EJ; Song IJ; Kang BC; Lee JS; Lim HJ; Yoon SJ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Mar; 46(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27051637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
    Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
    Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.