These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28127734)

  • 1. Normal values for microperimetry with the MAIA microperimeter: sensitivity and fixation analysis in healthy adults and children.
    Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 27(5):607-613. PubMed ID: 28127734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and Intersession Agreement of Microperimetric and Fixation Measurements Obtained with a New Microperimeter in Normal Eyes.
    Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 25859613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retinal Sensitivity and Fixation Analysis Using Microperimetry in Children With Anisometropic Amblyopia.
    Dikkaya F; Karaman Erdur S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Jul; 57(4):246-250. PubMed ID: 32687209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixation pattern analysis with microperimetry in nystagmus patients.
    Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 50(6):413-21. PubMed ID: 26651299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ocular fixation and macular integrity by microperimetry in multiple sclerosis.
    Gil-Casas A; Piñero Llorens DP; Molina-Martin A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 259(1):157-164. PubMed ID: 32975682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) Microperimetry in Children: Sensitivity, Reliability, and Fixation Stability in Healthy Observers.
    Jones PR; Yasoubi N; Nardini M; Rubin GS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 57(14):6349-6359. PubMed ID: 27898980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
    Shah VA; Chalam KV
    Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative data set identifying properties of the macula across age groups: integration of visual function and retinal structure with microperimetry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Sabates FN; Vincent RD; Koulen P; Sabates NR; Gallimore G
    Retina; 2011; 31(7):1294-302. PubMed ID: 21358460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interdevice comparison of retinal sensitivity assessments in a healthy population: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-3 microperimeters.
    Balasubramanian S; Uji A; Lei J; Velaga S; Nittala M; Sadda S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 28495907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference Clinical Database for Fixation Stability Metrics in Normal Subjects Measured with the MAIA Microperimeter.
    Morales MU; Saker S; Wilde C; Pellizzari C; Pallikaris A; Notaroberto N; Rubinstein M; Rui C; Limoli P; Smolek MK; Amoaku WM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 5(6):6. PubMed ID: 27867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
    Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training.
    Bozkurt Oflaz A; Turgut Öztürk B; Gönül Ş; Bakbak B; Gedik Ş; Okudan S
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 52(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 35196835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central perimetric sensitivity estimates are directly influenced by the fixation target.
    Denniss J; Astle AT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 27146101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of fixation characteristics in amblyopia using microperimetry.
    Altinbay D; Sahli E; Bingol Kiziltunc P; Atilla H
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 43(9):3403-3412. PubMed ID: 37184805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES.
    Parodi MB; Triolo G; Morales M; Borrelli E; Cicinelli MV; Cascavilla ML; Bandello F
    Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1662-9. PubMed ID: 26214316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors Influencing Fixation Stability Area: A Comparison of Two Methods of Recording.
    Fragiotta S; Carnevale C; Cutini A; Rigoni E; Grenga PL; Vingolo EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Apr; 95(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 29554006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fixation Pattern Analysis With Microperimetry In Strabismic Subjects: A Pilot Study.
    Milla-Barrios M; Piñero DP; Molina-Martín A
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 37(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 35666653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metrics and Acquisition Modes for Fixation Stability as a Visual Function Biomarker.
    Schönbach EM; Ibrahim MA; Kong X; Strauss RW; Muñoz B; Birch DG; Sunness JS; West SK; Scholl HPN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 May; 58(6):BIO268-BIO276. PubMed ID: 28973313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FEATURES OF THE MACULA AND CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD AND FIXATION PATTERN IN PATIENTS WITH RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA.
    Sayman Muslubas I; Karacorlu M; Arf S; Hocaoglu M; Ersoz MG
    Retina; 2018 Feb; 38(2):424-431. PubMed ID: 28178068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static and dynamic retinal fixation stability in microperimetry.
    Longhin E; Convento E; Pilotto E; Bonin G; Vujosevic S; Kotsafti O; Midena E
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 24093183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.