These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28127782)
1. Finding the power to reduce publication bias. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JP Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1580-1598. PubMed ID: 28127782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harnessing the power of excess statistical significance: Weighted and iterative least squares. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):407-420. PubMed ID: 35549315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-analysis. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(13):2116-27. PubMed ID: 25809462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neither fixed nor random: weighted least squares meta-regression. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):19-42. PubMed ID: 27322495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study. Bürkner PC; Doebler P Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 26054026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis. Bowden J; Jackson D; Thompson SG Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):945-55. PubMed ID: 20213702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis. Lin L; Chu H Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias? Saveleva E; Selinski S J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling publication bias in meta-analysis: a review. Sutton AJ; Song F; Gilbody SM; Abrams KR Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):421-45. PubMed ID: 11191259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power. Borm GF; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Simmonds M Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature. De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology. Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study. Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]