272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28128700)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of an integrated fixation cage during fatigue loading: a human cadaver study.
Palepu V; Peck JH; Simon DD; Helgeson MD; Nagaraja S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 28128700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrated Fixation Cage Loosening Under Fatigue Loading.
Nagaraja S; Palepu V
Int J Spine Surg; 2017; 11(3):20. PubMed ID: 28765804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of a lateral expandable cage and its comparison with a static device for lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical investigation.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Laun J; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 24484306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexibility and fatigue evaluation of oblique as compared with anterior lumbar interbody cages with integrated endplate fixation.
Freeman AL; Camisa WJ; Buttermann GR; Malcolm JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 26407089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.
Koller H; Schmoelz W; Zenner J; Auffarth A; Resch H; Hitzl W; Malekzadeh D; Ernstbrunner L; Blocher M; Mayer M
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2848-56. PubMed ID: 25612849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of lateral lumbar interbody fusion constructs with lateral and posterior plate fixation: laboratory investigation.
Fogel GR; Parikh RD; Ryu SI; Turner AW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 24405464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and biomechanical performance of a novel transdiscal screw system for one level in non-spondylolisthetic lumbar fusion: an in vitro investigation.
Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Lee WE; Waddell JK; Vrionis FD
Spine J; 2014 Apr; 14(4):705-13. PubMed ID: 24268392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
Keiler A; Schmoelz W; Erhart S; Gnanalingham K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumbar lateral interbody cage with plate augmentation: in vitro biomechanical analysis.
Le Huec JC; Liu M; Skalli W; Josse L
Eur Spine J; 2002 Apr; 11(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11956919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of facetectomy and crosslink augmentation on motion segment flexibility in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Chutkan NB; Zhou H; Akins JP; Wenger KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E828-35. PubMed ID: 18923306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
