These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28128855)

  • 21. Model Selection and Estimation with Quantal-Response Data in Benchmark Risk Assessment.
    Peña EA; Wu W; Piegorsch W; West RW; An L
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):716-732. PubMed ID: 27322778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confidence bands for logistic regression with restricted predictor variables.
    Piegorsch WW; Casella G
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):739-50. PubMed ID: 3203128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of methods of benchmark-dose estimation for continuous response data.
    West RW; Kodell RL
    Risk Anal; 1999 Jun; 19(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 10765417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Calculation of out-of-field dose distribution in carbon-ion radiotherapy by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Yonai S; Matsufuji N; Namba M
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5028-39. PubMed ID: 22894428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantalization of continuous data for benchmark dose estimation.
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Dec; 24(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 8975754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simultaneous confidence bands for comparisons to placebo, with application to detecting the minimum effective dose.
    Soulakova JN; Sampson AR; Jia G; Gleser LJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 22204529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Point and interval estimation of baseline risk and treatment effect based on logistic model for observational studies.
    Wang X; Yin L
    Biom J; 2015 May; 57(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 25810034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incorporating additional biological phenomena into two-stage cancer models.
    Sielken RL; Bretzlaff RS; Stevenson DE
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 387():237-60. PubMed ID: 7972250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monotonic Bayesian semiparametric benchmark dose analysis.
    Wheeler M; Bailer AJ
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1207-18. PubMed ID: 22385024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Hyperbolic and Constant Width Simultaneous Confidence Bands in Multiple Linear Regression under MVCS Criterion.
    Liu W; Hayter AJ; Piegorsch WW
    J Multivar Anal; 2009 Aug; 100(7):1432-1439. PubMed ID: 20368761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Properties of model-averaged BMDLs: a study of model averaging in dichotomous response risk estimation.
    Wheeler MW; Bailer AJ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Jun; 27(3):659-70. PubMed ID: 17640214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exact simultaneous confidence bands for a collection of univariate polynomials in regression analysis.
    Kosorok MR; Qu R
    Stat Med; 1999 Mar; 18(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 10209815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Likelihood contour method for the calculation of asymptotic upper confidence limits on the risk function for quantitative responses.
    Banga S; Patil GP; Taillie C
    Risk Anal; 2001 Aug; 21(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 11726016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exact nonparametric confidence bands for the survivor function.
    Matthews D
    Int J Biostat; 2013 Oct; 9(2):185-204. PubMed ID: 24127545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A risk-adjusted O-E CUSUM with monitoring bands for monitoring medical outcomes.
    Sun RJ; Kalbfleisch JD
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 23383682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Properties of R(2) statistics for logistic regression.
    Hu B; Palta M; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 16059870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of three methods for integrating historical information for Bayesian model averaged benchmark dose estimation.
    Shao K
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Sep; 34(2):288-296. PubMed ID: 22647377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
    Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.