434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28128901)
21. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Editorial Comment: Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy : Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Averbeck MA
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):271. PubMed ID: 28328189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.
Anusionwu II; Wright EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jan; 32(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 22693077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: is cuff downsizing effective?
Saffarian A; Walsh K; Walsh IK; Stone AR
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):567-9. PubMed ID: 12544308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective follow-up study of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.
Collado Serra A; Domínguez-Escrig J; Gómez-Ferrer Á; Batista Miranda E; Rubio-Briones J; Solsona Narbón E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1387-1394. PubMed ID: 27654121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Non-erosive urethral perforation between tandem artificial urinary sphincter cuffs.
Baumgartner TS; Hudak SJ
Can J Urol; 2016 Apr; 23(2):8240-2. PubMed ID: 27085831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immediate Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) Reactivation at the Time of Urethral Cuff Exchange is Not Associated with Increased Erosion Rate.
Rabinowitz MJ; Haney NM; Liu JL; Dani H; Cohen AJ; Wright EJ
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():253-256. PubMed ID: 34343563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of Radiation and Transcorporeal Artificial Sphincter Placement in Patients with Prior Urethral Cuff Erosion: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
Moser DC; Kaufman MR; Milam DF; Johnsen NV; Cleves MA; Broghammer JA; Brant WO; Jones LA; Brady JD; Gross MS; Jani K; Henry GD
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1338-1343. PubMed ID: 30563652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach.
Henry GD; Graham SM; Cleves MA; Simmons CJ; Flynn B
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1475-9; discussion 1479. PubMed ID: 18295275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.
Rothschild J; Chang Kit L; Seltz L; Wang L; Kaufman M; Dmochowski R; Milam DF
J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 23820053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.
Sathianathen NJ; McGuigan SM; Moon DA
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 24131859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Risk factors for subsequent urethral atrophy in patients undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement.
Ziegelmann MJ; Linder BJ; Viers BR; Rangel LJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Turk J Urol; 2019 Mar; 45(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 30484767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tandem transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff salvage technique: surgical description and results.
Magera JS; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1015-9; discussion 1019-20. PubMed ID: 17296400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mechanical failure rates of artificial urinary sphincter components: Is the 3.5-cm urethral cuff at higher risk?
Loh-Doyle JC; Hartman N; Nazemi A; Wayne K; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Jan; 38(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 30248180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Downsizing Improves Continence and Patient Satisfaction in Cases of Sub-cuff Atrophy.
Krughoff K; Nosé BD; Peterson AC
J Urol; 2023 Apr; 209(4):742-751. PubMed ID: 36583650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes of single- vs double-cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion in low- and high-risk profile male patients with severe stress urinary incontinence.
Ahyai SA; Ludwig TA; Dahlem R; Soave A; Rosenbaum C; Chun FK; Fisch M; Schmid M; Kluth LA
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 26917355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era.
Bergeson RL; Yi YA; Baker RC; Ward EE; Davenport MT; Morey AF
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Feb; 9(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 32055466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
