These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28128988)

  • 1. The Importance of Team Sex Composition in Team-Training Research Employing Complex Psychomotor Tasks.
    Jarrett SM; Glaze RM; Schurig I; Arthur W
    Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):833-843. PubMed ID: 28128988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.
    Butchibabu A; Sparano-Huiban C; Sonenberg L; Shah J
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):595-610. PubMed ID: 27113991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Team Training for Dynamic Cross-Functional Teams in Aviation: Behavioral, Cognitive, and Performance Outcomes.
    Littlepage GE; Hein MB; Moffett RG; Craig PA; Georgiou AM
    Hum Factors; 2016 Dec; 58(8):1275-1288. PubMed ID: 27549389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using brain-based measures to compose teams: how individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance.
    Woolley AW; Hackman JR; Jerde TE; Chabris CF; Bennett SL; Kosslyn SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2007; 2(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 18633809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Team members' interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness: a catastrophic relationship?
    Naber AM; McDonald JN; Asenuga OA; Arthur W
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):163-76. PubMed ID: 25790576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Team Workload Questionnaire (TWLQ) in a Team-Choice Task.
    Greenlee ET; Funke GJ; Rice L
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):348-359. PubMed ID: 30277798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming.
    McNeese NJ; Demir M; Cooke NJ; Myers C
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):262-273. PubMed ID: 29185818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance.
    Edwards BD; Day EA; Arthur W; Bell ST
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 16737368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Land Ahoy! Understanding Submarine Command and Control During the Completion of Inshore Operations.
    Roberts APJ; Stanton NA; Fay D
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1263-1288. PubMed ID: 28982016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams.
    Cooke NJ; Gorman JC; Duran JL; Taylor AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2007 Sep; 13(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 17924800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
    van der Weiden A; Aarts H; Prikken M; van Haren NE
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis.
    Bell ST
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):595-615. PubMed ID: 17484544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task.
    Villado AJ; Arthur W
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 May; 98(3):514-28. PubMed ID: 23356248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks.
    Bell EC; Willson MC; Wilman AH; Dave S; Silverstone PH
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 16260156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study.
    Nakarada-Kordic I; Weller JM; Webster CS; Cumin D; Frampton C; Boyd M; Merry AF
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):229. PubMed ID: 27581377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ready to rumble: how team personality composition and task conflict interact to improve performance.
    Bradley BH; Klotz AC; Postlethwaite BE; Brown KG
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Mar; 98(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 22963513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in performance on three novel continuous response tasks.
    Klavora P; Esposito JG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Aug; 95(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 12365275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance.
    Henning RA; Boucsein W; Gil MC
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Apr; 40(3):221-32. PubMed ID: 11228349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Team task analysis: differentiating between tasks using team relatedness and team workflow as metrics of team task interdependence.
    Arthur W; Glaze RM; Bhupatkar A; Villado AJ; Bennett W; Rowe LJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Apr; 54(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 22624293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of collective performance in collaboration networks.
    Amelkin V; Askarisichani O; Kim YJ; Malone TW; Singh AK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204547. PubMed ID: 30304044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.