These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Post-Movement Beta Activity in Sensorimotor Cortex Indexes Confidence in the Estimations from Internal Models. Tan H; Wade C; Brown P J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(5):1516-28. PubMed ID: 26843635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid online correction is selectively suppressed during movement with a visuomotor transformation. Gritsenko V; Kalaska JF J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3084-104. PubMed ID: 20844106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feedback control of one's own action: Self-other sensory attribution in motor control. Asai T Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 38():118-29. PubMed ID: 26587957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements. Sarlegna FR; Mutha PK Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):144-54. PubMed ID: 25038472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error-independent effect of sensory uncertainty on motor learning when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged. Hewitson CL; Kaplan DM; Crossley MJ PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e1010526. PubMed ID: 37683013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Sense of Agency Is More Sensitive to Manipulations of Outcome than Movement-Related Feedback Irrespective of Sensory Modality. David N; Skoruppa S; Gulberti A; Schultz J; Engel AK PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161156. PubMed ID: 27536948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When Optimal Feedback Control Is Not Enough: Feedforward Strategies Are Required for Optimal Control with Active Sensing. Yeo SH; Franklin DW; Wolpert DM PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005190. PubMed ID: 27973566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation. Saijo N; Gomi H J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alteration of a motor learning rule under mirror-reversal transformation does not depend on the amplitude of visual error. Kasuga S; Kurata M; Liu M; Ushiba J Neurosci Res; 2015 May; 94():62-9. PubMed ID: 25561430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The tuning of human motor response to risk in a dynamic environment task. Dunning A; Ghoreyshi A; Bertucco M; Sanger TD PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125461. PubMed ID: 25901604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of command signal power distribution, processing delays, and speed scaling on neurally-controlled devices. Marathe AR; Taylor DM J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046031. PubMed ID: 26170261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Errors of Our Ways: Understanding Error Representations in Cerebellar-Dependent Motor Learning. Popa LS; Streng ML; Hewitt AL; Ebner TJ Cerebellum; 2016 Apr; 15(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 26112422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of state estimation explains improvements in sensorimotor performance across childhood. King BR; Oliveira MA; Contreras-Vidal JL; Clark JE J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 107(11):3040-9. PubMed ID: 22378169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is visual-based, online control of manual-aiming movements disturbed when adapting to new movement dynamics? Mackrous I; Proteau L Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):223-32. PubMed ID: 24874948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]