130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28130048)
1. Artifacts Caused by Breast Tissue Markers in a Dedicated Cone-beam Breast CT in Comparison to Full-field Digital Mammography.
Wienbeck S; Nowak C; Zapf A; Stamm G; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Lotz J; Fischer U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):908-915. PubMed ID: 28130048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ex Vivo Study of Artifacts Caused by Breast Tissue Markers with Different 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla MRI Scanners - A Bicentric Study.
Puesken M; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Rhiem K; Große Hokamp N; Maintz D; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 32008930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.
Qu X; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1233-46. PubMed ID: 26514684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.
Tavakoli Taba S; Baran P; Nesterets YI; Pacile S; Wienbeck S; Dullin C; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Lockie D; Mayo SC; Quiney HM; Dreossi D; Arfelli F; Tromba G; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 31974689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visibility and artifacts of gold fiducial markers used for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer on MRI.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Lens E; van der Horst A; Houweling AC; Klaassen R; van Hooft JE; Stoker J; van Tienhoven G; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2638-47. PubMed ID: 25979055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe.
Wienbeck S; Lotz J; Fischer U
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():50-59. PubMed ID: 27875762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.
Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Luftner-Nagel S; Zapf A; Surov A; von Fintel E; Stahnke V; Lotz J; Fischer U
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5185-5195. PubMed ID: 28677053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of a novel liquid fiducial marker for multimodal image guidance in stereotactic body radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
De Roover R; Crijns W; Poels K; Peeters R; Draulans C; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2205-2217. PubMed ID: 29537613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography.
Li H; Yin L; He N; Han P; Zhu Y; Ma Y; Liu A; Lu H; Gao Z; Liu P; Wu Y; Ye Z
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108674. PubMed ID: 31557718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation.
Vedantham S; Tseng HW; Konate S; Shi L; Karellas A
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(3):405-426. PubMed ID: 32333575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification and comparison of visibility and image artifacts of a new liquid fiducial marker in a lung phantom for image-guided radiation therapy.
Scherman Rydhög J; Irming Jølck R; Andresen TL; Munck Af Rosenschöld P
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2818-26. PubMed ID: 26127034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography.
Zhao B; Zhang X; Cai W; Conover D; Ning R
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25439008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preclinical investigation for developing injectable fiducial markers using a mixture of BaSO4 and biodegradable polymer for proton therapy.
Ahn SH; Gil MS; Lee DS; Han Y; Park HC; Sohn JW; Kim HY; Shin EH; Yu JI; Noh JM; Cho JS; Ahn SH; Choi DH
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2626-37. PubMed ID: 25979054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
