These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28130269)

  • 1. Weekly Formative Exams and Creative Grading Enhance Student Learning in an Introductory Biology Course.
    Bailey EG; Jensen J; Nelson J; Wiberg HK; Bell JD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28130269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How accurate is peer grading?
    Freeman S; Parks JW
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 21123695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking exams and letter grades: how much can teachers delegate to students?
    Kitchen E; King SH; Robison DF; Sudweeks RR; Bradshaw WS; Bell JD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 17012219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students' reasoning skills.
    Bailey EG; Greenall RF; Tullis MM; Williams KR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250143. PubMed ID: 33886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal final exam in introductory biology yields gains in student content knowledge and longitudinal performance.
    Luckie DB; Rivkin AM; Aubry JR; Marengo BJ; Creech LR; Sweeder RD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):515-29. PubMed ID: 24006399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of bioinformatics into an undergraduate biology curriculum and the impact on development of mathematical skills.
    Wightman B; Hark AT
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2012; 40(5):310-9. PubMed ID: 22987552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.
    Bierer SB; Dannefer EF; Taylor C; Hall P; Hull AL
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(7):e171-7. PubMed ID: 18777415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Building a student learning-focused assessment and grading system in dental school: One school's experience.
    Zubiaurre Bitzer LA; Dathatri S; Fine JB; Swan Sein A
    J Dent Educ; 2023 May; 87(5):614-624. PubMed ID: 36607618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses.
    Momsen J; Offerdahl E; Kryjevskaia M; Montplaisir L; Anderson E; Grosz N
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013 Jun; 12(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 23737631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.
    Freeman S; O'Connor E; Parks JW; Cunningham M; Hurley D; Haak D; Dirks C; Wenderoth MP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 17548875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) biology.
    Orr R; Foster S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 24006398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Difficulty and Format of Exams Predicts Gender and Socioeconomic Gaps in Exam Performance of Students in Introductory Biology Courses.
    Wright CD; Eddy SL; Wenderoth MP; Abshire E; Blankenbiller M; Brownell SE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27252299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes.
    Armstrong N; Chang SM; Brickman M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 17548878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed results from a multiple regression analysis of supplemental instruction courses in introductory physics.
    Burkholder E; Salehi S; Wieman CE
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249086. PubMed ID: 33793607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Writing Assignments with a Metacognitive Component Enhance Learning in a Large Introductory Biology Course.
    Mynlieff M; Manogaran AL; St Maurice M; Eddinger TJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 26086661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.
    Srougi MC; Miller HB; Witherow DS; Carson S
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2013; 41(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 23868378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowing is half the battle: Assessments of both student perception and performance are necessary to successfully evaluate curricular transformation.
    Shaw TJ; Yang S; Nash TR; Pigg RM; Grim JM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210030. PubMed ID: 30633765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses.
    Smith AC; Stewart R; Shields P; Hayes-Klosteridis J; Robinson P; Yuan R
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15917873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.