264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28130351)
1. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar.
McAlinden C; Gao R; Yu A; Wang X; Yang J; Yu Y; Chen H; Wang Q; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 101(9):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 28130351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.
Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of cycloplegia on the lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry.
Huang J; McAlinden C; Su B; Pesudovs K; Feng Y; Hua Y; Yang F; Pan C; Zhou H; Wang Q
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1691-6. PubMed ID: 23160440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.
Chen W; McAlinden C; Pesudovs K; Wang Q; Lu F; Feng Y; Chen J; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1626-32. PubMed ID: 22763002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.
Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 34091551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer.
Mandal P; Berrow EJ; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS; Uthoff D; Holland D; Shah S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 98(2):256-8. PubMed ID: 24227803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability and Agreement of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer IOLMaster 700 Versus a Scheimpflug Imaging-Based Biometer AL-Scan in Cataract Patients.
Chan TCY; Wan KH; Tang FY; Wang YM; Yu M; Cheung C
Eye Contact Lens; 2020 Jan; 46(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 30985487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using three optical biometry measurement devices: the OA-2000, Lenstar-LS900 and IOLMaster-500.
Reitblat O; Levy A; Kleinmann G; Assia EI
Eye (Lond); 2018 Jul; 32(7):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 29527012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters.
Ferrer-Blasco T; Domínguez-Vicent A; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Aloy MA; Adsuara JE; Montés-Micó R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 255(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 27900479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
