These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28131068)

  • 41. The emergence of flexible spatial strategies in young children.
    Waismeyer AS; Jacobs LF
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Feb; 49(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 22545846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of spatial arrangement on 4- and 6-yr.-old children's memory.
    Axia G; Caravaggi D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Aug; 65(1):283-93. PubMed ID: 3684463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Proficient use of low spatial frequencies facilitates face memory but shows protracted maturation throughout adolescence.
    Peters JC; Kemner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():61-67. PubMed ID: 28732282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Feature-location binding in 3D: Feature judgments are biased by 2D location but not position-in-depth.
    Finlayson NJ; Golomb JD
    Vision Res; 2016 Oct; 127():49-56. PubMed ID: 27468654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of childhood hearing loss on organization of semantic memory: typicality and relatedness.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Dougherty M; Mehta J; Spence M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 17086079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does visual working memory represent the predicted locations of future target objects? An event-related brain potential study.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():258-66. PubMed ID: 25445999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Hierarchical use of cues in the missing object recognition task by rats (Rattus norvegicus).
    Arain M; Cohen J
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():41-52. PubMed ID: 23602980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Human aging alters the neural computation and representation of space.
    Schuck NW; Doeller CF; Polk TA; Lindenberger U; Li SC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():141-50. PubMed ID: 26003855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dentate gyrus supports slope recognition memory, shades of grey-context pattern separation and recognition memory, and CA3 supports pattern completion for object memory.
    Kesner RP; Kirk RA; Yu Z; Polansky C; Musso ND
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Mar; 129():29-37. PubMed ID: 26318932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.
    Anderson BA; Kim H
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():26-36. PubMed ID: 29758478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intrinsic frames of reference in haptic spatial learning.
    Yamamoto N; Philbeck JW
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):447-56. PubMed ID: 24007919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Altering object representations through category learning.
    Goldstone RL; Lippa Y; Shiffrin RM
    Cognition; 2001 Jan; 78(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 11062321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Crowded environments reduce spatial memory in older but not younger adults.
    Merriman NA; Ondřej J; Rybicki A; Roudaia E; O'Sullivan C; Newell FN
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):407-428. PubMed ID: 27783147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Age and gender-related differences in a spatial memory task in humans.
    León I; Tascón L; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 306():8-12. PubMed ID: 26965569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Examining reference frame interaction in spatial memory using a distribution analysis.
    Street WN; Wang RF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 26032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Causality influences children's and adults' experience of temporal order.
    Tecwyn EC; Bechlivanidis C; Lagnado DA; Hoerl C; Lorimer S; Blakey E; McCormack T; Buehner MJ
    Dev Psychol; 2020 Apr; 56(4):739-755. PubMed ID: 31944800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.