161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28132392)
41. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Adiposity at Age 10 and Mammographic Density among Premenopausal Women.
Alimujiang A; Imm KR; Appleton CM; Colditz GA; Berkey CS; Toriola AT
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2018 May; 11(5):287-294. PubMed ID: 29500187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Metabolic Syndrome and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Chilean Women.
Martínez-Arroyo A; Moreno-Macías H; Scalabrino AP; Garmendia ML
Nutr Cancer; 2017; 69(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28045557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and breast composition in a longitudinal study of Chilean girls.
Yoon L; Corvalán C; Pereira A; Shepherd J; Michels KB
Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):3. PubMed ID: 34998441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
Gemici AA; Arıbal E; Özaydın AN; Gürdal SÖ; Özçınar B; Cabioğlu N; Özmen V
Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Volumetric quantification of the effect of aging and hormone replacement therapy on breast composition from digital mammograms.
Hammann-Kloss JS; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Engelken F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 24788077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dairy intake in relation to breast and pubertal development in Chilean girls.
Gaskins AJ; Pereira A; Quintiliano D; Shepherd JA; Uauy R; Corvalán C; Michels KB
Am J Clin Nutr; 2017 May; 105(5):1166-1175. PubMed ID: 28381475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomarkers of mammographic density in premenopausal women.
His M; Lajous M; Gómez-Flores-Ramos L; Monge A; Dossus L; Viallon V; Gicquiau A; Biessy C; Gunter MJ; Rinaldi S
Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Jul; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 34301304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Influence of factors on mammographic density in premenopausal Chinese women.
Yang Y; Liu J; Gu R; Hu Y; Liu F; Yun M; Xiao Q; Wu M; Liu Q; Su F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Jul; 25(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 26075657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative breast density analysis to predict interval and node-positive cancers in pursuit of improved screening protocols: a case-control study.
Burnside ES; Warren LM; Myles J; Wilkinson LS; Wallis MG; Patel M; Smith RA; Young KC; Massat NJ; Duffy SW
Br J Cancer; 2021 Sep; 125(6):884-892. PubMed ID: 34168297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. First pregnancy events and future breast density: modification by age at first pregnancy and specific VEGF and IGF1R gene variants.
Prebil LA; Ereman RR; Powell MJ; Jamshidian F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA; Hurlbert MS; Benz CC
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-68. PubMed ID: 24801045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.
Holland K; van Gils CH; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 28161786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Automated Volumetric Breast Density derived by Shape and Appearance Modeling.
Malkov S; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2014 Mar; 9034():90342T. PubMed ID: 25083119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Type 2 diabetes and mammographic breast density among underserved women.
Sanderson M; O'Hara H; Foderingham N; Dupont WD; Shu XO; Peterson N; Fair AM; Disher AC
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 Feb; 26(2):303-309. PubMed ID: 25421380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early life socioeconomic environment and mammographic breast density.
Tehranifar P; Cohn BA; Flom JD; Protacio A; Cirillo P; Lumey LH; Michels KB; Terry MB
BMC Cancer; 2017 Jan; 17(1):41. PubMed ID: 28068940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
