BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28132859)

  • 1. Improved performance of prostate DCE-MRI using a 32-coil vs. 12-coil receiver array.
    Riederer SJ; Borisch EA; Froemming AT; Grimm RC; Kawashima A; Mynderse LA; Trzasko JD
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():15-23. PubMed ID: 28132859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI?
    Lim C; Quon J; McInnes M; Shabana WM; El-Khodary M; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):689-97. PubMed ID: 25556957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. T2 Turbo Spin Echo With Compressed Sensing and Propeller Acquisition (Sampling k-Space by Utilizing Rotating Blades) for Fast and Motion Robust Prostate MRI: Comparison With Conventional Acquisition.
    Bischoff LM; Katemann C; Isaak A; Mesropyan N; Wichtmann B; Kravchenko D; Endler C; Kuetting D; Pieper CC; Ellinger J; Weber O; Attenberger U; Luetkens JA
    Invest Radiol; 2023 Mar; 58(3):209-215. PubMed ID: 36070533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of magnetic field strength and receiver coil in ocular MRI: a phantom and patient study.
    Erb-Eigner K; Warmuth C; Taupitz M; Willerding G; Bertelmann E; Asbach P
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):830-7. PubMed ID: 23888471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small Field-of-view single-shot EPI-DWI of the prostate: Evaluation of spatially-tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses.
    Attenberger UI; Rathmann N; Sertdemir M; Riffel P; Weidner A; Kannengiesser S; Morelli JN; Schoenberg SO; Hausmann D
    Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 26300045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel imaging compressed sensing for accelerated imaging and improved signal-to-noise ratio in MRI-based postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
    Sanders JW; Song H; Frank SJ; Bathala T; Venkatesan AM; Anscher M; Tang C; Bruno TL; Wei W; Ma J
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):816-824. PubMed ID: 29880449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
    Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate at 7 T.
    Lagemaat MW; Philips BW; Vos EK; van Uden MJ; Fütterer JJ; Jenniskens SF; Scheenen TW; Maas MC
    Invest Radiol; 2017 May; 52(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 28002239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo-based noise compensation in coil intensity corrected endorectal MRI.
    Lui D; Modhafar A; Haider MA; Wong A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Oct; 15():43. PubMed ID: 26459631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Highly accelerated acquisition and homogeneous image reconstruction with rotating RF coil array at 7T-A phantom based study.
    Li M; Zuo Z; Jin J; Xue R; Trakic A; Weber E; Liu F; Crozier S
    J Magn Reson; 2014 Mar; 240():102-12. PubMed ID: 24365100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. T2-weighted prostate MRI at 7 Tesla using a simplified external transmit-receive coil array: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings in two prostate cancer patients.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Zhang B; Ben-Eliezer N; Le Nobin J; Melamed J; Deng FM; Taneja SS; Wiggins GC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):226-32. PubMed ID: 24259458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate imaging: evaluation of a reusable two-channel endorectal receiver coil for MR imaging at 1.5 T.
    Haider MA; Krieger A; Elliott C; Da Rosa MR; Milot L
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):556-65. PubMed ID: 24471393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate cancer: Comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Neil J; Kong X; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Taouli B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 20093608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of proximity and noise level of phased array coil elements on overall signal-to-noise in parallel MR spectroscopy.
    Fleischer CC; Zhong X; Mao H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():125-130. PubMed ID: 29217493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.
    Ruel L; Brugières P; Luciani A; Breil S; Mathieu D; Rahmouni A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 14975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model-based image reconstruction with wavelet sparsity regularization for through-plane resolution restoration in T
    Borisch EA; Froemming AT; Grimm RC; Kawashima A; Trzasko JD; Riederer SJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jan; 89(1):454-468. PubMed ID: 36093998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.