These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28132931)

  • 1. Assessing uncertainty in dynamic functional connectivity.
    Kudela M; Harezlak J; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():165-177. PubMed ID: 28132931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of global signal regression on characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
    Xu H; Su J; Qin J; Li M; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():127-145. PubMed ID: 29476914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?
    Hindriks R; Adhikari MH; Murayama Y; Ganzetti M; Mantini D; Logothetis NK; Deco G
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():242-256. PubMed ID: 26631813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest.
    Leonardi N; Richiardi J; Gschwind M; Simioni S; Annoni JM; Schluep M; Vuilleumier P; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():937-50. PubMed ID: 23872496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sliding-window analysis tracks fluctuations in amygdala functional connectivity associated with physiological arousal and vigilance during fear conditioning.
    Baczkowski BM; Johnstone T; Walter H; Erk S; Veer IM
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():168-178. PubMed ID: 28300639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Realistic models of apparent dynamic changes in resting-state connectivity in somatosensory cortex.
    Shi Z; Rogers BP; Chen LM; Morgan VL; Mishra A; Wilkes DM; Gore JC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Nov; 37(11):3897-3910. PubMed ID: 27296233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in dynamic and static functional connectivity between young and elderly healthy adults.
    Park JE; Jung SC; Ryu KH; Oh JY; Kim HS; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Shim WH
    Neuroradiology; 2017 Aug; 59(8):781-789. PubMed ID: 28689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical inference of dynamic resting-state functional connectivity using hierarchical observation modeling.
    Sojoudi A; Goodyear BG
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Dec; 37(12):4566-4580. PubMed ID: 27464464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the pros and cons of using temporal derivatives to assess brain functional connectivity.
    Ochab JK; Tarnowski W; Nowak MA; Chialvo DR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():577-585. PubMed ID: 30267855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic reorganization of intrinsic functional networks in the mouse brain.
    Grandjean J; Preti MG; Bolton TAW; Buerge M; Seifritz E; Pryce CR; Van De Ville D; Rudin M
    Neuroimage; 2017 May; 152():497-508. PubMed ID: 28315459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Track-weighted dynamic functional connectivity (TW-dFC): a new method to study time-resolved functional connectivity.
    Calamante F; Smith RE; Liang X; Zalesky A; Connelly A
    Brain Struct Funct; 2017 Nov; 222(8):3761-3774. PubMed ID: 28447220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A variance components model for statistical inference on functional connectivity networks.
    Fiecas M; Cribben I; Bahktiari R; Cummine J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():256-266. PubMed ID: 28130192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-varying correlation coefficients estimation and its application to dynamic connectivity analysis of fMRI.
    Fu Z; Di X; Chan SC; Hung YS; Biswal BB; Zhang Z
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2944-7. PubMed ID: 24110344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic properties of functional connectivity in the rodent.
    Keilholz SD; Magnuson ME; Pan WJ; Willis M; Thompson GJ
    Brain Connect; 2013; 3(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 23106103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of time-varying functional connectivity in the rat.
    Thompson GJ; Merritt MD; Pan WJ; Magnuson ME; Grooms JK; Jaeger D; Keilholz SD
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():826-36. PubMed ID: 23876248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives.
    Preti MG; Bolton TA; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 160():41-54. PubMed ID: 28034766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic thresholding networks for schizophrenia diagnosis.
    Zou H; Yang J
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 May; 96():25-32. PubMed ID: 31164208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic functional connectivity using state-based dynamic community structure: method and application to opioid analgesia.
    Robinson LF; Atlas LY; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():274-91. PubMed ID: 25534114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification.
    Wee CY; Yang S; Yap PT; Shen D;
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Jun; 10(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 26123390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.