These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28133376)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of asymmetric mesio-distal molar positions loaded by a symmetric cervical headgear.
    Kizilova N; Geramy A; Romashov Y
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(4):97-106. PubMed ID: 28133376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element method (FEM) analysis of the force systems produced by asymmetric inner headgear bows.
    Geramy A; Kizilova N; Terekhov L
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 22372268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric headgear for differential molar movement: a study using finite element analysis.
    Squeff LR; Ruellas AC; Penedo ND; Elias CN; Sant'anna EF; Casaccia GR; Gomes JC; Gouvêa JP
    J Orthod; 2009 Sep; 36(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 19741175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unequal outer and inner bow configurations: comparing 2 asymmetric headgear systems.
    Brosh T; Portal S; Sarne O; Vardimon AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):68-75; discussion 75-7. PubMed ID: 16027627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distal molar movement with Kloehn headgear: is it stable?
    Melsen B; Dalstra M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 12695763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces.
    Maruo IT; Maruo H; Saga AY; de Oliveira DD; Argenta MA; Tanaka OM
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27264500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Marchiori Farret M; de Lima EM; Pereira Araújo V; Deon Rizzatto SM; Macedo de Menezes L; Lima Grossi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):847-51. PubMed ID: 18298206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
    Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric analysis of molar and anterior tooth movement during cervical headgear treatment in relation to growth patterns.
    Godt A; Berneburg M; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 May; 69(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 18506404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentofacial effects of asymmetric headgear and cervical headgear with removable plate on unilateral molar distalization.
    Altug H; Bengi AO; Akin E; Karacay S
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 16097227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Isik F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symmetric and asymmetric expansion of molars using a Burstone-type transpalatal arch. Biomechanical and clinical analysis.
    Tsetsilas M; Konermann AC; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Sep; 76(5):377-90. PubMed ID: 26250453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.
    Taner TU; Yukay F; Pehlivanoglu M; Cakirer B
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 14719733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two asymmetric headgear force systems: A finite element analysis.
    Sadeghi S; Hedayati Z; Mousavi-Fard B
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 May; 24(2):41.e1-41.e6. PubMed ID: 31116285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bondemark L; Karlsson I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial tooth movement under extraoral force and considerations for controlled molar movement.
    Yoshida N; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yamada Y
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 7639433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effect of molar position on the distalization behavior of indirect headgear].
    Breier M; Bourauel C; Drescher D; Schwarze CW
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1995 Jul; 56(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 7649515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper headgear versus lower headgear, yokes, and class III elastics.
    Osvaldik-Trapl M; Droschl H
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 272132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetric Outer Bow Length and Cervical Headgear Force System: 3D Analysis Using Finite Element Method.
    Geramy A; Hassanpour M; Emadian Razavi ES
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Mar; 12(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 26622275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.