These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28133386)

  • 1. Application of the Teager-Kaiser Energy Operator in an autonomous burst detector to create onset and offset profiles of forearm muscles during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Krabben T; Prange GB; Kobus HJ; Rietman JS; Buurke JH
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(4):135-144. PubMed ID: 28133386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different algorithms based on TKEO for EMG change point detection.
    Wang S; Zhu S; Shang Z
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 35697015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teager-Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection.
    Solnik S; Rider P; Steinweg K; DeVita P; Hortobágyi T
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Oct; 110(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 20526612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Onset detection in surface electromyographic signals across isometric explosive and ramped contractions: a comparison of computer-based methods.
    Crotty ED; Furlong LM; Hayes K; Harrison AJ
    Physiol Meas; 2021 Apr; 42(3):. PubMed ID: 33725688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An adaptive algorithm for the determination of the onset and offset of muscle contraction by EMG signal processing.
    Xu Q; Quan Y; Yang L; He J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jan; 21(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 23193462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teager-Kaiser Operator improves the accuracy of EMG onset detection independent of signal-to-noise ratio.
    Solnik S; DeVita P; Rider P; Long B; Hortobágyi T
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2008; 10(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 19032000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A pattern recognition technique to characterize the differential modulation of co-activating muscles at the performer/environment interface.
    Pelland L; McKinley P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Oct; 14(5):539-54. PubMed ID: 15301773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of upper arm EMG signals during object-specific grasp.
    Martelloni C; Carpaneto J; Micera S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5061-4. PubMed ID: 19163854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Teager-Kaiser energy operation of surface EMG improves muscle activity onset detection.
    Li X; Zhou P; Aruin AS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 35(9):1532-8. PubMed ID: 17473984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relation between object properties and EMG during reaching to grasp.
    Fligge N; Urbanek H; van der Smagt P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Apr; 23(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 23207412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ranking hand movements for myoelectric pattern recognition considering forearm muscle structure.
    Na Y; Kim SJ; Jo S; Kim J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Aug; 55(8):1507-1518. PubMed ID: 28054301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification of finger activation for use in a robotic prosthesis arm.
    Peleg D; Braiman E; Yom-Tov E; Inbar GF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Dec; 10(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 12611366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grasp force estimation from the transient EMG using high-density surface recordings.
    Martinez IJR; Mannini A; Clemente F; Sabatini AM; Cipriani C
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Feb; 17(1):016052. PubMed ID: 31899898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces.
    Hashemi Oskouei A; Paulin MG; Carman AB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Feb; 23(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 22999075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles.
    Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 15811606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Analysis of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Hand Muscle EMG for Improved Pattern Recognition Control.
    Adewuyi AA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Apr; 24(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 25955989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of Transient Myoelectric Signals for the Control of Multi-Grasp Hand Prostheses.
    Kanitz G; Cipriani C; Edin BB
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Sep; 26(9):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 30072331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraction and Classification of Multichannel Electromyographic Activation Trajectories for Hand Movement Recognition.
    AbdelMaseeh M; Chen TW; Stashuk DW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Jun; 24(6):662-73. PubMed ID: 26099148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EMG signal decomposition using motor unit potential train validity.
    Parsaei H; Stashuk DW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Mar; 21(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 23033332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncovering patterns of forearm muscle activity using multi-channel mechanomyography.
    Alves N; Chau T
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(5):777-86. PubMed ID: 19854064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.