118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28133742)
1. Technical Note: A method to evaluate dosimetric effects on organs-at-risk for treatment delivery systematic uncertainties.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Fu Y; Li HH; Mutic S; Yang D
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1552-1557. PubMed ID: 28133742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.
May L; Hardcastle N; Hernandez V; Saez J; Rosenfeld A; Poder J
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):910-921. PubMed ID: 38141043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric effects of patient displacement and collimator and gantry angle misalignment on intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Xing L; Lin Z; Donaldson SS; Le QT; Tate D; Goffinet DR; Wolden S; Ma L; Boyer AL
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Jul; 56(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 10869760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the gradient in gantry-table rotation on dynamic trajectory radiotherapy plan quality.
Loebner HA; Mueller S; Volken W; Wallimann P; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Fix MK; Manser P
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7104-7117. PubMed ID: 37748175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fixed-jaw method to protect critical organs during intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Chen J; Chen X; Huang M; Dai J
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 25087082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the dosimetric impact of organ-at-risk delineation variability in head and neck radiation therapy in the context of patient setup uncertainty.
Aliotta E; Nourzadeh H; Siebers J
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(13):135020. PubMed ID: 31071687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of systematic MLC positional uncertainties on the quality of single-isocenter multi-target VMAT-SRS treatment plans.
Prentou G; Pappas EP; Prentou E; Yakoumakis N; Paraskevopoulou C; Koutsouveli E; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Karaiskos P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13708. PubMed ID: 35733367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison between jaw tracking and static jaw techniques in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Feng Z; Wu H; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Cheng J; Su X
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jan; 10():28. PubMed ID: 25623899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison between 2-dimensional radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in treatment of advanced T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: to treat less or more in the planning organ-at-risk volume of the brainstem and spinal cord.
Chau RM; Teo PM; Kam MK; Leung SF; Cheung KY; Chan AT
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17980826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a commercial biologically based IMRT treatment planning system.
Semenenko VA; Reitz B; Day E; Qi XS; Miften M; Li XA
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5851-60. PubMed ID: 19175141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of MLC leaf width on treatment adaptation and accuracy for concurrent irradiation of prostate and pelvic lymph nodes.
Shang Q; Qi P; Ferjani S; Xia P
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061701. PubMed ID: 23718580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the impact of treatment delivery uncertainties on treatment effectiveness for lung SABR.
Blake SJ; Arumugam S; Holloway L; Vinod S; Ochoa C; Phan P; Hansen CR; Thwaites DI
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 40(4):823-829. PubMed ID: 29086179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiobiologic comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and conformal radiotherapy in treating lung cancer accounting for secondary malignancy risks.
Komisopoulos G; Mavroidis P; Rodriguez S; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 25168596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.
Xu H; Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1018-27. PubMed ID: 21452739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dosimetric and delivery advantages of a new 160-leaf MLC.
Prah DE; Kainz K; Peng C; Li XA
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 10(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 21517128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application.
Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robustness of IMPT treatment plans with respect to inter-fractional set-up uncertainties: impact of various beam arrangements for cranial targets.
Hopfgartner J; Stock M; Knäusl B; Georg D
Acta Oncol; 2013 Apr; 52(3):570-9. PubMed ID: 23244675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
