These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28134796)

  • 1. Earthquake Damage Visualization (EDV) Technique for the Rapid Detection of Earthquake-Induced Damages Using SAR Data.
    Sharma RC; Tateishi R; Hara K; Nguyen HT; Gharechelou S; Nguyen LV
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 28134796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Field of the Chi-Chi Earthquake Inferred from SAR Image Matching.
    Hu J; Li ZW; Ding XL; Zhu JJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2008 Oct; 8(10):6484-6495. PubMed ID: 27873882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating Urban Building Damage of 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence Using SAR Change Detection.
    Wang X; Feng G; He L; An Q; Xiong Z; Lu H; Wang W; Li N; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Wang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 37514636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses.
    Kassem MM; Mohamed Nazri F; Noroozinejad Farsangi E
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():199-211. PubMed ID: 30766800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SAR and optical images correlation illuminates post-seismic landslide motion after the Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal).
    Lacroix P; Gavillon T; Bouchant C; Lavé J; Mugnier JL; Dhungel S; Vernier F
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6266. PubMed ID: 35428776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-earthquake damage classification and assessment: case study of the residential buildings after the
    Mouloud H; Chaker A; Nassim H; Lebdioui S; Rodrigues H; Agius MR
    Bull Earthq Eng; 2023; 21(2):849-891. PubMed ID: 36466195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic recognition of seismic intensity based on RS and GIS: a case study in Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake of China.
    Zhang Q; Zhang Y; Yang X; Su B
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():878149. PubMed ID: 24688445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Earthquake insurance pricing: a risk-based approach.
    Lin JH
    Disasters; 2018 Apr; 42(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 28543429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and present status of seismic evaluation and seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Japan.
    Okada T
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2021; 97(7):402-422. PubMed ID: 34380916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SAR and Optical Data Comparison for Detecting Co-Seismic Slip and Induced Phenomena during the 2018 M
    Polcari M; Tolomei C; Bignami C; Stramondo S
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 31540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seismic vulnerability assessment to earthquake at urban scale: A case of Mostaganem city in Algeria.
    Chaibedra B; Benanane A; Boutaraa Z
    Jamba; 2018; 10(1):473. PubMed ID: 29955262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Artificial Intelligence Application for Post-Earthquake Damage Mapping in Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.
    Syifa M; Kadavi PR; Lee CW
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30696050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MyShake: A smartphone seismic network for earthquake early warning and beyond.
    Kong Q; Allen RM; Schreier L; Kwon YW
    Sci Adv; 2016 Feb; 2(2):e1501055. PubMed ID: 26933682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of Mobile Signaling Data in Determining the Seismic Influence Field: A Case Study of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake, China.
    Guo X; Wei B; Nie G; Su G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 36078413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the Performance and Stability of the Highway Subgrades in Seismic Events, a Case Study of the Changning Earthquake, Sichuan.
    Cui Z; Zhang M; Wu K; Ma H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36361260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D Co-Seismic Surface Displacements Measured by DInSAR and MAI of the 2017 Sarpol Zahab Earthquake, Mw7.3.
    Ali R; Wu X; Chen Q; Elubid BA; Dafalla DS; Kamran M; Aldoud AA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Aug; 19(16):. PubMed ID: 36011467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mapping three-dimensional surface deformation caused by the 2010 Haiti earthquake using advanced satellite radar interferometry.
    Jung HS; Hong SM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188286. PubMed ID: 29145475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process.
    Tena-Colunga A; Hernández-Ramírez H; Godínez-Domínguez EA; Pérez-Rocha LE
    J Civ Struct Health Monit; 2021; 11(5):1275-1299. PubMed ID: 34367862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specific seismic retrofitting of a compact reinforced concrete building with X-bracings and steel jackets. Application to a primary school in Huelva.
    Romero-Sánchez E; Morales-Esteban A; Requena-García-Cruz MV; Zapico-Blanco B; de-Miguel-Rodríguez J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238505. PubMed ID: 32915839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.