BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28137341)

  • 1. Evaluating the Potential Benefits of Advanced Automatic Crash Notification.
    Plevin RE; Kaufman R; Fraade-Blanar L; Bulger EM
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Apr; 32(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 28137341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimate of mortality reduction with implementation of advanced automatic collision notification.
    Lee E; Wu J; Kang T; Craig M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S24-S30. PubMed ID: 28384071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.
    He K; Zhang P; Wang SC
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2019 Aug; 34(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 31322099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic collision notification availability and emergency response times following vehicle collision-an analysis of the 2017 crash investigation sampling system.
    Griffin RL; Carroll S; Jansen JO
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S135-S139. PubMed ID: 33040588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits and tradeoffs for varied high-severity injury risk thresholds for advanced automatic crash notification systems.
    Bahouth G; Graygo J; Digges K; Schulman C; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S134-40. PubMed ID: 25307378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An estimate of the effectiveness of an in-vehicle automatic collision notification system in reducing road crash fatalities in South Australia.
    Ponte G; Ryan GA; Anderson RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 26098414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of earlier or automatic collision notification on traffic mortality by survival analysis.
    Wu J; Subramanian R; Craig M; Starnes M; Longthorne A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14 Suppl():S50-7. PubMed ID: 23905750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the effect of emergency care on early survival after traffic crashes.
    Clark DE; Winchell RJ; Betensky RA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():141-7. PubMed ID: 24056285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association Between Emergency Medical Service Response Time and Motor Vehicle Crash Mortality in the United States.
    Byrne JP; Mann NC; Dai M; Mason SA; Karanicolas P; Rizoli S; Nathens AB
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Apr; 154(4):286-293. PubMed ID: 30725080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Appropriate analysis of CIREN data: using NASS-CDS to reduce bias in estimation of injury risk factors in passenger vehicle crashes.
    Elliott MR; Resler A; Flannagan CA; Rupp JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):530-9. PubMed ID: 20159077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicted effect of automatic crash notification on traffic mortality.
    Clark DE; Cushing BM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2002 Jul; 34(4):507-13. PubMed ID: 12067113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-scene intravenous line insertion adversely impacts prehospital time in rural vehicular trauma.
    Gonzalez RP; Cummings GR; Phelan HA; Mulekar MS; Rodning CB
    Am Surg; 2008 Nov; 74(11):1083-7. PubMed ID: 19062666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of emergency medical services times on traffic injury severity: A random effects ordered probit approach.
    Lee J; Abdel-Aty M; Cai Q; Wang L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):577-581. PubMed ID: 29693416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of mobile phone proliferation on crash notification times and fatality rates.
    Stickles JL; Kempema JM; Brown LH
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):24-26. PubMed ID: 28666628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():1-8. PubMed ID: 26773695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Secondary collisions revisited: real-world crash data and relationship to crash test criteria.
    Gowat RC; Gabauer DJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 23259518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does increased emergency medical services prehospital time affect patient mortality in rural motor vehicle crashes? A statewide analysis.
    Gonzalez RP; Cummings GR; Phelan HA; Mulekar MS; Rodning CB
    Am J Surg; 2009 Jan; 197(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18558397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From roadside to bedside: the regionalization of trauma care in a remote rural county.
    Grossman DC; Hart LG; Rivara FP; Maier RV; Rosenblatt R
    J Trauma; 1995 Jan; 38(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 7745644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.