These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2813775)

  • 1. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene RE; Oestmann JW; Kamalsky JM; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; Robertson CL; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM; Prokop M; Schmidt A; Neitzel U; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
    Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.
    Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.