These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28138834)

  • 1. Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
    Mata A; Ferreira MB; Voss A; Kollei T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1980-1986. PubMed ID: 28138834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of language comprehension in reasoning: how "good-enough" representations induce biases.
    Mata A; Schubert AL; Ferreira MB
    Cognition; 2014 Nov; 133(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 25156628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment.
    Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye Movements, Pupil Dilation, and Conflict Detection in Reasoning: Exploring the Evidence for Intuitive Logic.
    Purcell ZA; Roberts AJ; Handley SJ; Howarth S
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jun; 47(6):e13293. PubMed ID: 37303274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning?
    Pennycook G; Fugelsang JA; Koehler DJ
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22575046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An easy fix for reasoning errors: Attention capturers improve reasoning performance.
    Mata A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1695-1702. PubMed ID: 32419616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From bias to sound intuiting: Boosting correct intuitive reasoning.
    Boissin E; Caparos S; Raoelison M; De Neys W
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104645. PubMed ID: 33676145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
    Patel N; Baker SG; Scherer LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2129-2153. PubMed ID: 31021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
    Mata A; Ferreira MB
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():24. PubMed ID: 29434561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associative processes in intuitive judgment.
    Morewedge CK; Kahneman D
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Oct; 14(10):435-40. PubMed ID: 20696611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thinking in a foreign language distorts allocation of cognitive effort: Evidence from reasoning.
    Białek M; Muda R; Stewart K; Niszczota P; Pieńkosz D
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104420. PubMed ID: 33032818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Belief inhibition in children's reasoning: memory-based evidence.
    Steegen S; De Neys W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jun; 112(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 22402412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do children struggle on analogical reasoning tasks? Considering the role of problem format by measuring visual attention.
    Guarino KF; Wakefield EM; Morrison RG; Richland LE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Apr; 224():103505. PubMed ID: 35091207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement.
    Pennycook G; Fugelsang JA; Koehler DJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Aug; 80():34-72. PubMed ID: 26091582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning.
    Frey D; Johnson ED; De Neys W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1188-1208. PubMed ID: 28376653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.
    Frey DP; Bago B; De Neys W
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1284. PubMed ID: 28790962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning.
    Schubert AL; Ferreira MB; Mata A; Riemenschneider B
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104629. PubMed ID: 33626418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To deliberate or not? The role of intuition and deliberation when controlling for irrelevant information in selection decisions.
    Rabinovitch H; Bereby-Meyer Y; Budescu DV
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105105. PubMed ID: 35366485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum.
    Brosnan M; Ashwin C
    Autism; 2023 Jul; 27(5):1245-1255. PubMed ID: 36325717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.